2024-01-10 GATF Meeting Notes - Americas
This TF schedules meetings as needed. Each meeting will be announced on the GSWG mailing list and the #governance-architecture-tf Slack channel.
The current cadence is that there are two GATF meetings every two weeks:
Wednesday at 7pm EST/4pm PDT/Thursday 9am AEST
Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/94290110805?pwd=OEVhd2IwUUxTblNtYUNOVEtGaUNBUT09
Thursday at 6pm AEST/10am CEST/3pm GMT+7h
https://zoom.us/j/97765626957?pwd=L2RFRmczTlpoWS9RQkhwaUdjaVpHdz09
The meetings (and Zoom links) are available on the ToIP meeting calendar
https://lf-toip.atlassian.net/wiki/display/HOME/Calendar+of+ToIP+Meetings
Zoom Meeting Links / Recordings
Not edited, meeting "proper" starts around 5 minutes in
Audio Transcript Link:
Attendees
Wendy Seltzer
Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)
Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes |
3 min |
| Chairs |
|
2 min | Review of previous action items | Chairs | Objective: Discuss and agree on a single diagram representation of the governance architecture for Trust over IP. |
Topic #1 | Discussion centred on how might we move towards a single representation of the governance architecture for ToIP. Full transcript and video recording links above. | ||
Topic #2 | Summary of the key points and agreed actions from the meeting (generated by ChatGPT4 from the meeting transcript and edited by hand thereafter): Key Points:
Agreed Actions:
| ||
Topic #3 | |||
Topic #4 | |||
5 mins |
| Chairs |
Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)
Chat Transcript
00:10:11 Scott Perry: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zrBKAMGgWcXnj4fzOOdyBBZbkRbjpE3k/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=108677846726640960846&rtpof=true&sd=true
00:10:40 Wendy Seltzer: What do I need to do to get account access for the GDocs?
00:10:46 Judith Fleenor: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/11Vsf6EruYMFNihBKk0X35f5935ymVEUL
00:11:04 Carly Huitema: To have access to gdocs you should be given access with the email address you used to join ToIPO
00:11:16 Carly Huitema: If you need a different email to be approved you need to share that with Judith
00:11:28 Wendy Seltzer: Thanks Carly, will do!
00:13:23 Judith Fleenor: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1RuGeS1DqvwDl81Xye5T7qg84fByY1E4l
00:18:18 Judith Fleenor: Here is the presentation package folder:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1BIgzebdkRGxD7dldUTCMHQP3wqYCgd_g
00:22:08 Judith Fleenor: @Wendy Seltzer what email address did you use when you joined, if that email address doesn’t give you access, let me know and I can make sure it is added.
00:23:04 Wendy Seltzer: Thanks Judith, just sent you an email
00:25:03 Neil Thomson: The Design of Everyday things:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/840.The_Design_of_Everyday_Things
00:25:32 Neil Thomson: Key aspect of any interface - what does it's appearance tell you about what you can do with it (it's "affordance)
00:31:23 Judith Fleenor: For those who might want to read this a second or third time … here is a link to this presentation: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1aWdHX4BxGWwpaJPtw96Oeg5jknMF7-rXWHq3cUIly7Y/edit#slide=id.p
00:34:48 Judith Fleenor: https://www.trustoverip.org/toip-model/
00:42:34 Carly Huitema: fractal governance comes back as an observation!
00:43:03 Neil Thomson: Governance is an aspect of every component and role and their interactions.
Doesn't map to a "layer" or "stack"
00:43:40 Carly Huitema: Reacted to "Governance is an asp..." with 👍
00:44:20 Carly Huitema: Replying to "Governance is an asp..."
Governance was always parallel to the technical stack, I thought that was a good indication it fit for each part.
00:47:03 Jo Spencer: Reacted to "Governance was alway..." with 👍
00:49:38 Neil Thomson: Replying to "Governance is an asp..."
Governance, is a set of approaches concepts and guidance which has aspects with each component, relationship role, but also across all of those individual "governance/thing" relationships
00:51:05 John Phillips: Here's an example of a (complex) diagram representing a system of things and a processes: https://scaledagileframework.com/
00:52:14 Carly Huitema: I'm thinking about that - who is our audience? Or what are some audiences that we have and what information are they looking for that we can provide?
00:52:20 Neil Thomson: People learn quickest (and are most easily convinced) where what you are proposing is a "half-step" from what they know and are currently doing, which boild down to the following
- a new way to do something familiar
- a use something familiar to do something new
00:52:29 Carly Huitema: Reacted to "People learn quickes..." with 👍
00:53:01 Carly Huitema: Audience - some? looking to add more trust to their existing ways of doing things?
00:53:03 Neil Thomson: Replying to "People learn quickes..."
So each audience may need a different why of presenting that is an series of half steps from where they are
00:53:29 Jo Spencer: We're looking to create a picture (or set of pictures) that identify the concepts or considerations that need to be looked at in developing a trust ecosystem.
I like the 'ingredients' concept. In thinking about the components, you're talking physical ecosystem solution systems. How these solutions are used and what they need to consider is what ToIP is looking to guide (rather than own).
00:55:15 Carly Huitema: From our EFWG survey, which didn't go very far from ToIP members, most people who answered were managers, leaders in their organization looking at solutions around trust
00:55:17 Jo Spencer: If you want to talk architecture - have a look at Zachman, which is a framework...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zachman_Framework
00:57:28 Neil Thomson: So a key audience to have in mind is how ToIP Trust concepts maps to Zero Trust Architecture.
00:57:45 Neil Thomson: ZTA is now mandated for the US Gov
01:01:21 Carly Huitema: Replying to "ZTA is now mandated ..."
cool - link?
01:03:08 Neil Thomson: Replying to "ZTA is now mandated ..."
US Government Zero Trust Strategy
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/M-22-09.pdf
01:03:14 Carly Huitema: Reacted to "US Government Zero T..." with 👍
01:09:36 Neil Thomson: Actors vs. components - where "agents" help actors interact
01:10:45 Carly Huitema: I like capabilities instead of components.
01:11:06 Neil Thomson: And an agent is something that provides capabilities