2023-06-01 GSWG Meeting Notes

Meeting Date

The GSWG meets bi-weekly on Thursdays at 11:00-12:00 PT / 18:00-19:00 UTC. Check the ToIP Calendar for meeting dates.

Zoom Meeting Link / Recording

Attendees


Main Goal of this Meeting

Understand the opportunity to create a governance framework for dual-stack interoperability.

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
5 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:
5 minsReview of action items from previous meetingChairs
5 minsAnnouncements

TF Leads


Neil Thomson Attraction Pass TF - Focus - Attraction Pass ecosystem top issues/requirements - there are many players. Control (Authority) may be a large organization, a collection of dominant organizations or spread across a collection or consortium of organizations. Event ticket management, particularly for "double issue"/"spend," is an issue as double use of a ticket currently may only be discovered at or after an event.

Kabir Maiga We have a draft of the specifications started and will continue working on that over the next few weeks.

Issuer Requirements - Still in the discussion phase of top issues, differentiation of Issuer vs. Issuer Registry technical vs. governance. As an Issuer is a participant in direct and indirect interactions, it is suggested to capture/classify all requirements as Issuer specific/primary (initial priority) vs indirect/secondary. See proposal (sankarshan) Issuer Req’s Primary vs. Indirect/Secondary Observation - particularly in the Issuer, Holder, Verifier triangle (or similar component interactions) that issues/requirements be captured and considered separately to determine if those requirements can be pushed back on the individual components or if intermediaries may be required. Proposal on Issuer reqt's classification from Sankarshan. Note: Trust Registry governance is likely a variation on Issuer's governance.

Carly Governance Architecture Task Force

Discussion about what kind minimal governance of a trust registry we might consider for a 'ToIP trust registry' Interchange Std (which may include a specific API) CRUDA rules Identifier of the GA Credentials of the GA to help people judge if this is something they are willing to trust.

30 minsOpen 


5 minsAny other business

Savita Farooqui Asking for suggestions for upcoming agenda items

5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above








Action Items