Wenjing Chu Sam Smith 
Drummond Reed

Which sessions do we want to hold on what days—and who is planning to call them?

1. Wenjing Chu plans to call a session on the Implementers Draft itself.
2. Wenjing Chu also plans to call a session on the Rust implementation, including a demo to show something in action. This session will also discuss language bindings.
   1. Eric Scouten noted that one of his teammates, Gavin Peacock, specializes in that for the C2PA and CAI project.
   2. This session could also touch on consent and transports.
3. Sam Smith is planning a session on CESR 2.0.
4. Sam Smith could also do a session on the Python implementation.
5. Eric Scouten will be calling several session on C2PA.
6. Wenjing Chu would like to call a session about use cases for TSP & C2PA (note the AI & Metaverse Task Force meeting at 9AM PT).
7. Judith Fleenor plans to hold an Introduction to ToIP session using our 3G diagram of the ToIP Trust Canvas, including showing where specific specs "sit".
8. Philip Feairheller and the ACDC TF will be doing their "20 Day Huddle" on the 3 released specifications.
9. APAC: We discussed calling a session about how to bridge X.509 certificates and DIDs/VIDs by writing a spec that standardizes how to create that bridge by putting a DID/VID in the Subject Alternative Name field of the cert and publishing a reference to the cert in the corresponding DID document.

Judith noted that we should also be reaching out to attract other implementers.

Wenjing noted that there is a strong case for wallet implementations to implement TSP.

Judith also encouraged us to think ahead about implementers beyond IIW and our immediate community.

We agreed there were not any critical pre-announcement open issues. Wenjing will try to add a few more minor issues on his list.

Also, thank you to Philip Feairheller and Kevin Griffin for turning on GitHub Discussions on the TSP repo.

X5VTF: We discussed an existential question about an X.509 DID method(s). The question has been whether there is core use case for the use of X.509 VIDs in a content authenticity universe.

Jo Spencer suggested that the X.509 / DID / VID topic is one that should be discussed with CAs.

TRTF: Darrell O'Donnell said that there is some attention going into the TRP review.

TATF: Drummond Reed ...

AIMTF: Daniel Bachenheimer discussed the different types of use cases that will need to be covered in order to prove authenticity in an AI context.

Did:webs TF: Jo Spencer brought up a new alternative to the KERI-related complexity of did:webs called did:tdw (trustedweb). That new variation on did:web will be presented at IIW.

ACDC: The three specs are all in public review—see this blog post. Especially CESR.

TSPTF: We reviewed the draft blog post and added several more comments.