2024-01-24 TSPTF Meeting Notes
Meeting Date & Time
Jan 24, 2024 This Task Force meets every Wednesday. There are two meetings to serve different time zones:
NA/EU meeting: 08:00-09:00 PT / 16:00-17:00 UTC
APAC meeting: 18:00-19:00 PT / 02:00-03:00 UTC
See the Calendar of ToIP Meetings for exact meeting dates, times and Zoom links.
Zoom Meeting Recordings
NA/EU Meeting: https://zoom.us/rec/share/02SwmT8u5IyAakHCo5kVLqMtnlZ_48SuKAWRScgH5bM4f7foZGBjt0RldDfb0u3N.Cyjk3vv4fAPvUMms
APAC Meeting: https://zoom.us/rec/share/kqiQ23h5OFGgMxo2TayOPDbdLhY2P8PBZZvPKOWY8Y8Sy4M5-t5oAoSDrLqt0-WC.M4Tvpn_LZ0LFgXHG
Attendees
NA/EU:
APAC:
@Drummond Reed (first half hour)
@Darrell O'Donnell
@Wenjing Chu
@Ed Eykholt
@Daniel Bachenheimer
@Judith Fleenor (Deactivated)
Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)
Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes |
3 min |
| Chairs |
|
2 min | Review of previous action items | Chairs | ACTION: @Drummond Reed to check with @Darrell O'Donnell and @Kevin Griffin about progress on a ToIP Technical Specification Template (presumably using the Spec-Up tooling from DIF) so that @Wenjing Chu has a clear path to take once we are ready to convert the Working Draft from Google docs to GitHub Markdown (which is what the Spec-Up tooling produces). ACTION: @Drummond Reed to drop a note to @Michelle Janata to add the Trust Registry TF to the calendar invite description for the combined APAC meetings on Wednesdays 18:00-19:00 PT / 02:00-03:00 UTC. |
10 mins | Report on Spec-Up and ToIP Technical Spec Template Task Force | @Darrell O'Donnell @Drummond Reed | See action item #1 above and also the proposed Specification Template Task Force charter. We discussed the plan to migrate to Spec-Up and the template when we are ready to move to the First Implementers Draft. Darrell said he felt the template was mature enough for any new spec (such as the TSP spec, since it is coming over from a Google doc) to be able to start working with it immediately. ACTION: ALL TSPTF members to review the proposed Specification Template Task Force charter and post any feedback to the wiki page or to the TSWG2 mailing list. |
40 mins | Working Draft Feedback Review | @Wenjing Chu | Review comments, feedback, and open issues on the Working Draft. We had a long discussion about the term "relationship". There is 100% consensus that all TSP interactions take place between two VIDs. However there are multiple comments around how to describe the <insert-term-here> between two VIDs. The candidates discussed were:
There are cases to be made for and against each of these. @Tim Bouma For consideration - in the Public Sector Profile of the Pan-Canadian Trust Framework, we defined different types of relationships in Appendix D https://github.com/canada-ca/PCTF-CCP/blob/fa423e56308b004b8d9aff5c31f6463926f48715/Version1_4/PSP-PCTF-V-1.4-Consolidated-Overview-EN-2021-12-16.pdf We didn't resolve this terminology question on the call but agreed to park it for further cogitation. |
5 mins |
| Chairs |
Decisions
None.