Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes |
3 min | | Chairs | |
5 min | General announcements | All | Updates from TSWG members of general interest to the group. Abbie Barbir: Based in Ottawa, Abbie has been in the digital identity space for 20+ years, first with Nortel and then BOA, now with CVS. Very involved with SAML and FIDO — took both to the ITU. Also with the OIDF with trust elevation. Now very focused on decentralized identity.
|
2 mins | Review of Action Items from the previous meeting | Chairs | |
20 mins | Task Force Reports | TF Leads | Trust Registry TF — @Darrell O'Donnell Still relatively quiet, but will start to pick up with the introduction of some new TFs @Drummond Reed noted that interest in VC revocation is growing rapidly and there is a growing intersection between trust registries and revocation registries operated by revocation service providers (RSPs).
ACDC TF — @Sam Smith @Philip Feairheller @Philip Feairheller reported that the GLEIF vLEI ecosystem executed a pilot last week to show a full chain of ACDC credentials. A report was published on the GLEIF website. It was a good test of the full ACDC architecture. The current draft of the ACDC IETF Spec is https://github.com/trustoverip/tswg-acdc-specification @Judith Fleenor (Deactivated) asked about a blog post about the progress of the ACDC spec work ACTION: @Philip Feairheller to talk to the ACDC TF members about a blog post announcing the progress of the ACDC work and the successful GLEIF POC. @Daniel Bachenheimer brought up the question of how both ISO mDL/mDOC and ACDC credentials can be reconciled with the W3C Verifiable Credentials 1.0 spec requirements as part of the new W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0 work. @Drummond Reed mentioned that he had a good conversation with Arjan Geluk of UL in the Netherlands, editor of the mDL spec, about harmonizing efforts with the W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0 work.
Technology Architecture TF — @Wenjing Chu @Drummond Reed AI & Metaverse (AIM) Technology TF — @Wenjing Chu @Vikas Malhotra @Vikas Malhotra reported that the first meeting had ~15 participants and spent most of the meeting doing introductions and discussing the scope of this new TF — which is inherently quite broad but also quite pressing based on the rapid progress of AI, machine learning, and metaverse. Vikas reported that the second meeting has been scheduled for this Thursday at 12PM Eastern Time.
|
5 mins | Proposed New Task Force | @Darrell O'Donnell | web3 Concept Development Task Force Darrell explained the charter he has drafted for the web3 Concept Development Task Force The intent is to explore more concepts at depth AND drive membership / interest. Darrell explained that this TF grew out of discussions of the needs of the Cardano and IOG community to work on decentralized identity interoperability. It can be compared in some way to the ACDC TF that tackled work that was not being done elsewhere and which needed to be done in an IPR-safe venue. In this case the TF would be focused on the key digital identity and trust issues facing the web3 world. He gave several examples:
DID-based login Verifiable NFTs DIDs and DID fragment usage DIDs and trust registries — and revocation registries Compliance suites — this area needs to be much broader, i.e., to reach a full industry test suite that is perceived as industry neutral
Darrell feels that ToIP is a natural home for exploring this area. @Judith Fleenor (Deactivated) asked about the question of where the test suite work should be given that the Technology Architecture Task Force is also working on a test suite spec. Judith also said that she had raised the question of coordination on interop with the DIF Interop Working Group and discussed that with the @Kaliya Young as a co-chair of that group. ACTION: @Drummond Reed to send out a call for review notice today for the proposed web3 Concept Development Task Force and then a call for consensus in 7 days after any feedback has been incorporated.
|
5 mins | | Chairs |
|