/
2020-09-23 CTWG Meeting Notes

2020-09-23 CTWG Meeting Notes

Nov 20, 2020

Assumptions

  1. The CTWG process MUST not hold up work being preformed by other WGs.

  2. Term definitions arise based on situation context; Overtime that context may change thereby deprecating the definition.

Input

CONSUMABLE: Our users (ToIP Foundation) need to be able to easily submit content for maturation.

  • Item Submission ---> Most Granular artifact == TERM

    • Required (See Basic Term Data Model)

      • Name

      • Definition

    • CTWG Process Additions

      • Meta-Data

        • Clarification Attributes: Terms, Words, Concepts, etc

      • Tags (discovery, generation)

  • On-Time Pull:

    • Extract concepts from exiting sources

      • Sovrin

      • NIST

      • DIF (?)

    • All extracted content is MAPPED to the basic format (TERM)

  • Automated Source Monitoring

    • Ongoing (automated) process for extracting content from existing sources that are still evolving.

      • ESSIF Lab

      • W3C Specs (DID, VCreds)

    • All extracted content is MAPPED to the basic format (TERM)

Maturation

We need to define a process whereby each ITEM (regardless of input source) is managed in a consistent format for maturation.

General Assumptions

Input Workflows

  • Item Submission

    • Who are the stakeholders?

    • Phases

      • Clarification

      • Proposal

      • Accepted (ready for WG blessed output)

    • NOTE: Glossaries should be able to be produced regardless of any Workflow state.

Basic Term Data Model

  • We need a BASIC/COMMON data model for all items

The suggested Markdown should be used as a template for the GitHub TERM Issue Form.

PanDoc is a well know OS process for taking Markdown and outputting a variety of rendering formats.

Output

We need to provide/suggest/support processes for generation of various renderings of the content we manage:

  • Domain Glossaries

    • Website

    • PDF

    • Markdown

    • other

NOTE: See Issue #22