Time

Agenda Item

Lead

Notes

5 min

• Start recording

• Welcome & antitrust notice

• Introduction of new members

• Agenda review

Chairs

• Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.

• New Members:

1 min

Reminder - TSWG2 Mailing List

Chairs

Reminder that the Technology Stack Working Group has a new mailing list. You need to join this as it involves the new charter that TSWG is operating under. You can do that here:

• https://lists.trustoverip.org/g/technology-stack-wg-2

  Scroll to the Bottom
  Click Green Button to log-in to the mailing list
  Then Click Blue Button to +Join the list

5 min

Review of previous action items

Chairs

10 min

Preparation for Implementer Review

Chairs 

Discussion about:

• The reality of the Implementer Review stage - are we ready? (Darrell thinks yes)

• Steps required (administrative; social)

  • ACTION - all to review for loose ends and clarity.

  • GOAL: 05APR2024 launch (blog + IR)

• Goals of Implementer Review

• Approach for Changes/Updates - looking to do pretty rapid digest and dispositioning (i.e. processing tickets) and will update content during the review period. 

  • Do we think that GitHub is a sufficient notification means for people who provide input? (yes?)

• Outreach and Socialization - how will be share the message?

  • IIW - session or two - who will be there? Drummond, Andor will be present. 

FEEDBACK:

• @sankarshan good to get external feedback sooner

• @Drummond Reed yes 

• @Jacques Latour (Deactivated) Northern Block trust registry platform - CIRA sponsored - "running code" 
  
  

  • feedback to date - everyone has "trust lists" but have not been looking at credentials as much (e.g. list of government X websites - that's a trust list)

  • plugin - "green check" where websites are listed in a trust registry (and registry of registries)

  • We are doing a lot of complicated things that many don't understand, but many are already on the trust registry (list) path

  • C2PA/CAI has a trust list - need to make it public - plugin to find CAI-resource, do the CAI thing.

• @Scott Perry big need for public review - validating of our posture

• @Andor Kesselman are there any major building blocks or massive changes on the horizon that we're aware of that may pause us? (none noted)

• we are GO.

10 mins

Blog Post

Chairs

Input into DRAFT Blog Post.

We need to publish a blog along with starting the Implementor review. Please provide input. The goal is to get this to the Comms committee by the end of the weekend (24MAR2024). It is in rough shape but coming together.

10 mins

Special topic #3

naming - think on Trust Registry Query Protocol

Two pieces:

• "Query" - 

• "Protocol" - the implementation is an API Specification (alternate "Trust Registry Query Specification"

@Jacques Latour (Deactivated) - don't add "query" yet (limits future)

if we state that we are missing a trust layer

The new approach should integrate with the old...

• past - whois  was unstructured, RDAP is the structured replacement.

could standardize on RDAP...

• https://www.icann.org/rdap

• https://about.rdap.org/

Currently, we have a query-centric RESTful API; is RDAP next?

Demo - Trust Registry

@Jacques Latour (Deactivated) 

https://trustregistry.nborbit.ca/

running code

Registry-of-Registries may point to MyCreds.ca (ARUCC governed)

 @Fabrice Rochette would like to link to Orbit (need TRP API on it)

5 mins

• Review decisions/action items

• Planning for next meeting 

Chairs