2022-02-15 Meeting Page
1, February 2022 — 11:00 PT, 14:00 ET, 19:00 UTC, 20:00 CET
Send an email to utility-foundry-wg@lists.trustoverip.org to request a calendar invite (you can subscribe to the mailing list at lists.trustoverip.org).
RECORDING GOES HERE (North America / Europe):
Attendees
@Jessica Townsend
@Alex Tweeddale @Lynn Gray Bendixsen
@Judith Fleenor (Deactivated) @Markus Sabadello @Andre Kudra
Goals
Assign action items for next meeting
Establish work plan for WG deliverables and workflow guidance
Gather agenda suggestions for next meeting
Antitrust Policy
Agenda Items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
1 min | Welcome | J. Townsend |
|
2 mins | Antitrust Policy Notice | J. Townsend |
|
5 mins | Announcements | Chairs & All |
|
10 mins | Action Item Review | Chairs | Engagement with Tech Arch Task Force - working on tech stack for ToIP; layer specific specs for overall stack - Darrell O'Donnell/Drummond Reed co leads Outreach to KochiOrgBook point of contact to obtain updates given time zone challenges; incorporate into UFWG updates; "Vinod Panicker (iCORE-CRS)" <vinod.panicker@wipro.com> Cross reference the Public Identity Utilities for Digital Trust Ecosystems document against the ToIP formal best practices and table for Layer 1 Follow up with rj.reiser@liquidavatar.com on Glossary Task Force progress |
15 mins | Deliverable Overview | J. Townsend | Public Identity Utilities for Digital Trust Ecosystems - an Overview Assessment on several layer ones - existing research activity merge; solid set of criteria under UFWG SBA Research (cyber security) - didn't even criteria, used W3C document - rubric for evaluating DiD methods. took criteria to evaluate level of decentralization but expanded to security, privacy et al; criteria has adapted since evaluation would be good to build upon - questions as to which DiD method should be used; work has concluded did once based on research collaboration
|
15 mins | What's Next | A. Tweeddale |
|
0 mins | Updates on Utilities | L. Bendixsen | includes those not in run phase
|
0 mins | Q&A | N/A |
|
Announcements
Task Force SOS (Scrum of Scrums)
TF Name | Mission | Members | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
Utility Project Implementation Guide Task Force | Create the getting started guide for prospective Utility Projects. | @Lynn Gray Bendixsen (lead) @Dave McKay
| A new repo has been created and the TF has issued its first objective. Lynn seeks assistance on repo publishing with Mac. TF is discussing outline and questions to be answered for prospective projects. Draft Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zysi79y5vxNBxhL7yI0M6FAViC_E2VUutUfT5Eac7CA/edit?usp=sharing Initial released version: https://trustoverip.github.io/IG0029-utility-project-guide/ |
Best Practices Task Force | Analyze Project Interviews, establish list of Best Practices and submit each BP using ToIP Deliverables Process. | @mathieu (lead) @Claudia Grytz @Lynn Gray Bendixsen @Sarah Olfert @Dave McKay | Drafting framework for evaluating public identity utilities (BP0014) (v2) Drafting v1 of three BP documents (based on feedback from interviews with decentralized PIU conveners/providers)* BP0015 - Assessing Sustainability of a PIU (v1) BP0016 - Determining Affordability of a PIU (v1) BP0017 - Assessing Alignment to a PIU Backlog Dashboard Health / Network Monitoring (Example) *At future point, consider consolidating all best practices into one comprehensive document SUGGESTION: Interlocking with Saturn-V TF as a first user of these Best Practices. |
Decentralization Task Force | Submit a BP deliverable and a design principle for what it means to be Decentralized. | Jessica Townsend (lead) @mathieu | What are the key attributes of a Decentralized Utility? Should we consider / review the W3C DID Decentralization Rubric Consider their dimensions for evaluation Spectrum of Decentralization Working docs: Decentralized Network Best Practices and Decentralized Network Design Principles
|
Glossary Task Force | Generate a UFWG Glossary in collaboration with the CTWG. | @RJ Reiser (lead) | Still pending CTWG process. Submissions under review. |
Decision Points
Discussion Items
Open Items
Low priority items that failed gain volunteers to champion cause.