2020-07-27 Weekly Meeting
27, July 2020 — 8AM PT, 11AM ET, 16:00 UK, 17:00 CET
Send an email to technical-stack-wg@lists.trustoverip.org to request a calendar invite (you can subscribe to the mailing list at lists.trustoverip.org).
Attendees
@Dan Gisolfi
@Daniel Bachenheimer
@Drummond Reed
@Karl Kneis
Stephen Curran
Dave McKay
Agenda
Meeting (not recorded)
Welcome
Antitrust Policy Notice
New Introductions
Dave McKay, Northern Block, Toronto
Review minutes from last meeting (19-June-2020)
Refresh discussion on TIPs, TOIP Deliverables, Incubation Process
Discussion topics
Discussion of TIPs
one TIP per vertical?
agreement on horizontal interoperability
clarity that TIPs are for reference implementations - not just interoperability
Future Meeting Work
Define process (lifecycle)
Defining a TIP
Defining the proposal process
Incubation process
Adoption Metrics (e.g., "Graduating a TIP")
Please contribute to the terminology within the Terminology Wiki
Q&A
Action Items
Need to define Agenda for next meeting
Need to add USE CASES to TOIP Deliverables
Need to ensure that Tech Stack WG terms are shared with the Concepts & Terminology WG
Need to establish chair duration and cycle times
Possible library - collection of links
New
Education Event Topics to be scheduled for upcoming meetings:
Stephen Curran is planning to present Aries Vertical Interoperability: Pluggable DID Utilities to the TSWG as scheduling permits. Planned topics:
the evolution of Aries -- notably, the use of Indy ledger and did-peer
the goal of Aries to have interop at the ledger layer (but still did-peer)
the current state of Aries - with the current state of the frameworks
the likely evolution - BBS+ simplifying the ledger interface
Kapil Singh (kapil@us.ibm.com) can present on Decentralized DID Namespace Registry (DDNR)
Discussed the need to clarify what makes a TIP production ready and or adoptable for commercial purpose. Per the workflow model "A TIP represents a descriptive solution outline that once matured can be considered a market proven solution specification. " How is something market proven? If for example TOIP publishes a TIP based on Aries, what are the implications that Aries compatible wallets are not interoperable because versioning is relative? Each vendor can claim Aries compatibility and not be interoperable at the same time. What are the guard rails for underpinning frameworks and technology for interoperability, scalability, and performance? For POC investments these gaps are fine, but for production systems this is problematic. If there is a need, it will be represented in the lifecycle definition process. If there is misunderstanding, a white paper can be developed to close the gaps.
Need to a process to aggregate Customer Expectations and Misconceptions so that we can focus outreach accordingly (e.g., white paper(s))