Versions Compared

Version Old Version 1 New Version 2
Changes made by

Scott Perry

Scott Perry

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Steven explained the reorganization of the Inputs and Semantics WG into the Data Modeling and Representation WG.

Scott explained that he invited the leads of the two ISWG task forces to present at this meeting but they did not have enough notice to be able to attend today. They included:

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
5 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members: none
5 minReview of action items from previous meetingChairs

ACTION: Drummond Reed to line up Technology Architecture Task Force members to attend the following GSWG special topic meeting on Oct 20th for a discussion of: a) how the ToIP Technology Architecture Specification requirements affect the GSWG and our Governance Architecture specs, and b) what architectural components would be a good fit for the initial focus of our Governance Architecture Task Force.

5 minsAnnouncementsAll

News or events of interest to Governance Stack WG members:


5 minutesminsTechnology Governance Architecture Task Force (TATF)

Drummond Reed

Drummond explained how the progress of the TATF on the ToIP Technology Architecture Specification (TAS) V1 is likely to affect the GSWG. This link is to the Google doc version of Working Draft 03 — it is being superseded by the GitHub version.

  • First, he pointed out that it brought clarity to the progression of four workstreams that will eventually produce the full ToIP stack. See screenshot #1 below, which appears in section 4 of the TAS.
  • He explained the structure of the TAS and how all normative requirements were consolidated in Appendix A.
  • He agreed with Scott that a GSWG review of these requirements would be a logical next step in two directions:
    1. To review what changes may be necessary to our Governance Architecture specifications.
    2. To suggest the set of components to be the focus of the Governance Architecture TF work.
5 minsGovernance Architecture Task Force

Carly

Carly

A summary of ongoing task force meetings
20 minutesIEEE Whitepaper on Blockchain Governance

Savita Farooqui 

15 minsReorg of the Inputs and Semantics Working Group

Steven Milstein 

Savita will present the current IEEE whitepaper on Blockchain governance
15 minsNotice and Consent Task Force

(Mark Lizar and Salvatore D'Agostino

)

Privacy


The Notice and

Risk Task Force (Former user (Deleted))

Consent Task Force has moved under the GSWG.  Sal and Mark will discuss the task force, their work and future objectives.

5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs


...