Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Meeting Date

  • The ToIP Trust Registry Task Force (TRTF) meets weekly twice every Thursday at the following times (to cover global time zones - see the Calendar of ToIP Meetings for full meeting info including Zoom links):
    • NA/EU 07:00-8:00 PT / 15:00-16:00 UTC 
    • APAC 18:00-19:00 PT / 02:00-03:00 UTC

Zoom Meeting Link / Recording

Attendees

NA/EU Meeting


Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
5 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:
1 minReminder - TSWG2 Mailing ListChairs

Reminder that the Technology Stack Working Group has a new mailing list. You need to join this as it involves the new charter that TSWG is operating under. You can do that here:

5 minReview of previous action itemsChairs
2 minEasyCLA

Darrell O'Donnell 

EasyCLA was recently turned on ToIP wide by the LF. Follow the EasyCLA process to get it configured.

  • It is a simple control that ensures everyone is aware of the IPR licenses used by ToIP. We had some inconsistent application of it. 
  • EasyCLA onboarding
5 minsVID or DID?

Darrell O'Donnell 

I shifted over a few months ago to use VID instead of DID. We're using VID as a general term more and more (Tech Architecture Spec, Trust Spanning Protocol).

But, when we get down to brass tacks, we have a call that returns the list of "VID Methods" which are really "DID Methods". As an example, the OAS has a call for `/lookup/vidmethods` that will really return DID Methods. DIDs are (mostly) VIDs so it works and allows extension.

Is this forward-looking and OK, or is it creating a non-normative problem? I don't see urgency as this can be in the Implementor Draft but it is something to think about. 
5 minsHelp Requested

Darrell O'Donnell 

We have a goal of getting to Implementer Review this month. Editorial, OpenAPI/Swagger, requirements, and other assistance are needed. 
5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)

#1


Decisions

  • Sample Decision Item

Action Items

  • Sample Action Item


  • No labels