This TF schedules meetings as needed. Each meeting will be announced on the GSWG mailing list and the #governance-architecture-tf Slack channel.
The current cadence is that there are two GATF meetings every two weeks:
Americas: Wednesday 4pm PDT | 7pm EST | Thursday 9am AEST (UTC+10)
Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/94290110805?pwd=OEVhd2IwUUxTblNtYUNOVEtGaUNBUT09
APAC/Europe: Thursday 1am PDT | 6pm AEST (UTC+10) | CEST/3pm (UTC+2)
https://zoom.us/j/97765626957?pwd=L2RFRmczTlpoWS9RQkhwaUdjaVpHdz09
The meetings (and Zoom links) are available on the ToIP meeting calendar
https://wikilf-toip.trustoveripatlassian.orgnet/wiki/display/HOME/Calendar+of+ToIP+Meetings
Zoom Meeting Links / Recordings
...
Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)
Chat notes
00:07:47 sankarshan mukhopadhyay: Since this is the Governance Architecture TF I thought this work might be of interest. I find the effort to be interesting but I am disappointed with the output - it kind of makes a grab bag of concepts while ignoring the influence of an ecosystem in terms of risks on the choice of a blockchain. https://www.projectliberty.io/news/towards-a-responsible-decentralized-ecosystem-unveiling-project-liberty-institute-and-blockchaingov-s-blockchain-governance-toolkit
00:08:10 Carly Huitema: Reacted to "Since this is the Go..." with 👍
00:10:15 sankarshan mukhopadhyay: Google was training their model with publicly available Google documents anyway 🙂
00:10:34 Carly Huitema: Replying to "Google was training ..."
but at least it wasn't private google docs right....?
00:12:08 sankarshan mukhopadhyay: I wonder if Neil is implying that implementations of C2PA are titling more towards proprietary and closed source. This is a bit of anti-pattern to the IAM/DigitalID specs
00:21:57 John Phillips: I think we are exploring some very interesting concepts here: are the risks that we are concerned by those that consider whether the ecosystem will NOT do what it proposes to do, or that it WILL do what it proposes to do? In other words, are we assessing the risk to humanity in our opinion?
[this point is now being discussed, but I wanted to press enter!]
00:28:45 Carly Huitema: I don't even know or understand exactly how the green lock thing works. I doubt people are going to dive into metadata every time they find a photo
00:28:47 sankarshan mukhopadhyay: I’m wondering if “Utility” is a term which originated from the Sovrin Foundation (which has a Sovrin Utility Governance Framework)
00:29:47 Neil Thomson: Replying to "I’m wondering if “Ut..."
I suspect you are right.
00:32:24 sankarshan mukhopadhyay: Replying to "I’m wondering if “Ut..."
The Sovrin Ecosystem Governance Framework document https://sovrin.org/wp-content/uploads/Sovrin-Ecosystem-Governance-Framework-V3.1.pdf has a set of high level descriptions of risks and such (p13 in the document) It isn’t specifically focused on implementation but more on what might be the directionality of addressing such risks
00:38:41 John Phillips: https://www.linkedin.com/in/geoff-smith-gdpr/
00:42:36 sankarshan mukhopadhyay: As long as “everything is a VC” should not follow the “let us make NFTs of everything” poor habit.
00:45:00 Carly Huitema: ORDC?
00:45:59 Neil Thomson: OIDC - open id connect - current centralized authentication (modern version) based on OAuth
00:46:50 John Phillips: Here's an example of the conference focus:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/joergresch_did-catching-the-wave-in-government-and-activity-7206647518732976132-TeAM?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
00:49:20 Carly Huitema: Reacted to "OIDC - open id conne..." with 👍
Decisions
Action Items
Agreed activities were:
...