Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Meeting Date

  • The TSWG holds plenary meetings once every four weeks on Wednesdays. The 2023 meeting dates are Jan 4, Feb 1, Mar 1, Mar 29, Apr 26, May 24, Jun 21, Jul 19, Aug 16, Sep 13, Oct 11, Nov 8, Dec 6.
  • Two meetings are held each Wednesday to accommodate global time zones:
    • NA/EU Meeting: 08:00-09:00 PT / 16:00-17:00 UTC
    • APAC Meeting: 18:00-19:00 PT / 02:00-03:00 UTC
  • See the ToIP Calendar for all meeting dates, times and logistics, including Zoom links.

Zoom Meeting Link / Recording

(These links will be replaced with links to the recording of the meetings as soon as they are available)

Attendees

NA/EU:

APAC:

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
3 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:
    • Clare Nelson is the new Executive Director of the Decentralized Identity Foundation (DIF).
5 minGeneral announcementsAll

Updates from TSWG members of general interest to the group.

  • Clare mentioned that some major announcements are coming from DIF member companies. She said she's on a constant search for production use cases, especially those who are willing to make a guest blog post about it.
2 minReview of action items from the previous meetingChairs
25 minTask Force ReportsTF Leads

Technology Architecture TFWenjing Chu  Drummond Reed

  • Drummond reported that there is has been some good asynchronous progress on the three major action items left (glossary, revised conceptual diagram, use cases). Two of them are on our agenda today.
  • We are also seeing just what we predicted: the most important feedback on ToIP Technology Architecture Specification (TAS) requirements is coming from our own TFs — primarily the Trust Registry TF and the Trust Spanning Protocol TF.
  • So we will most likely want both of them to get to the Working Draft stage and see if they have any further feedback on the TAS requirements before we finalize it.

Trust Registry TFAndor Antti Kettunen  Darrell O'Donnell

  • Darrell explained that the TF has made several key decisions, starting with an objective statement that focuses on the definition of the Trust Registry Protocol. Other discussions, such as trust decision models, are going to be deferred.
  • The TF is now working on the logical model and a Swagger API definition.
  • Great collaboration with DIF members including Sam Curren and Andor. Good alignment.

Trust Spanning Protocol TFDrummond Reed Daniel Hardman Wenjing Chu Sam Smith 

  • Daniel Hardman shared that have just finished the proposal stage (the "preliminary input stage") and are about to enter the consolidation stage.
  • Six meetings have been dedicated to four proposals.
  • The Github discussions have been extremely in-depth and detailed — enough so that it is difficult for all TSPTF members to follow all of it.
  • The next major step is consolidation of the proposals: how we will figure out alignment between the protocols. We anticipate this will involve a lot of whiteboarding and discussion of tradeoffs.
  • The goal of this stage will be to have rough consensus on the design of the protocol.
  • Daniel is hoping that we will have a full draft by the Fall 2023 IIW.
  • Sam Smith shared that there are a lot of issues that are so meaty that they require in-depth Github discussion. But what they really require for resolution is extended workshops.
  • We anticipate we will need some longer "TSP Workshops" and are planning those now.
  • Judith Fleenor advocated having as much discussion at IIW as possible.

ACDC TF — Sam Smith Philip Feairheller 

  • Sam Smith said that the TF continues to work with the W3C Verifiable Credential Data Model 2.0 WG.
  • The TF is also working to advance the KERI, CESR, and ACDC specs at IETF in San Francisco in late July.
  • Any supporters are urged to attend the BOF that will be held there.
  • 20-30 people are attending the bi-weekly meetings. The ACDC ecosystem is growing beyond GLEIF.

AI & Metaverse (AIM) Technology TFWenjing Chu Vikas Malhotra 

ACTION ITEM:

15 minToIP Glossary Workspace ReportDrummond Reed 

We have made great strides in developing the ToIP Glossary Workspace as a Google doc, with thanks to contributions from Neil Thomson and Christine Martin. We will explain why we are taking this approach and the specific review and input we would like to request from TSWG members.

10 minUpdating our conceptual diagram of the ToIP stackDrummond Reed 

A report on the action item for the ToIP Technology Architecture Specification V1.0 to create a third-generation version of our conceptual diagram.

The slide deck for proposals has been created here. Please contribution your suggestions!


  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)

#1


Decisions

  • Sample Decision Item

Action Items

  • Sample Action Item


  • No labels