Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Meeting Date

  • The TSWG holds plenary meetings once every four weeks on Tuesdays. The 2024 meeting dates are: 23 Jan, 20 Feb, 19 Mar, 16 Apr, 14 May, 11 June, 9 July, 6 Aug, 3 Sept, 1 Oct, 29 Oct, and 26 Nov.
  • Two meetings are held each Tuesday to accommodate global time zones:
    • NA/EU Meeting: 08:00-09:00 PT / 15:00-16:00 UTC
    • APAC Meeting: 18:00-19:00 PT / 01:00-02:00 UTC
  • See the ToIP Calendar for all meeting dates, times and logistics, including Zoom links.

Zoom Meeting Link / Recording

(These links will be replaced with links to the recording of the meetings as soon as they are available)

Attendees

NA/EU:

APAC:

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
3 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:

Reminder - Joining the TSWG2 Mailing ListChairs

Reminder that the Technology Stack Working Group has a new mailing list. You must join this mailing list to be a formal member of the TSWG. You can do that here:

10 minGeneral announcementsAll

Updates from TSWG members of general interest to the group.


2 minReview of action items from the previous meetingChairs

Drummond Reed reported there were now objections to the establishment of either of the TFs above, so they are not official asynchronous TFs of the TSWG. They will not report regularly at the TSWG Plenary unless there is specific news to share.

ACTION: Kevin Griffin will create the Slack channels for both new TFs and schedule a kickoff meeting for the Specification Template Task Force.

20 minTask Force ReportsTF Leads

Technology Architecture TFWenjing Chu  Drummond Reed

  • Work is going on very actively on the 3rd generation ToIP stack diagram.
  • See the agenda item below about the Spec-Up template and ToIP Glossary integration.
  • Our goal is to move the spec to Spec-Up, integrate the Canonical Use Cases text, add the 3rd generation ToIP stack diagram, and integrate the ToIP Glossary refs/defs before IIW (April 16-18).

Trust Registry TFAndor Antti Kettunen  Darrell O'Donnell

  • On track for Implementer Draft in March.
  • Requirements and OAS/Swagger coming along.
  • Participation encouraged - especially implementers.
    • Mathieu - started looking at the Trust Registry API spec. Will be providing feedback hopefully in February.

Trust Spanning Protocol TFDrummond Reed Wenjing Chu Sam Smith 

  • On track to publish the first Implementers Draft in early March.

ACDC TF — Sam Smith Philip Feairheller 

  • The road to public review continues, latest update is KERI has a list of before-public-review  issues and we are identifying a bonus TF call this week to do the same for ACDC/CESR.
  • Sam Smith said they have a provisional registration from IANA for the CESR media type. IANA suggests that the TF does a community review first, which will be followed by a professional review.

AI & Metaverse (AIM) Technology TFWenjing Chu 

  • Working on a proposal for an Authentic AI __________.

Credential Exchange Protocols TFmathieu 

  • Restart meeting last week. Key focus was looking at both the human and machine aspect of the protocols.
  • Most of the focus last year was on the issuance protocols.
  • Now the focus is moving to the presentation protocols.
  • Looking to proposal a new deliverable.

did:webs Task Force  Lance Byrd Philip Feairheller Markus Sabadello 

  • Kevin Griffin reported the TF is still working through the disposition of comments from the public review.
  • Lance Byrd is working on a reference implementation.
  • Charles Lanahan reported that he is also looking at an implementation.

X.509 VID Task ForceEric Scouten Wenjing Chu

  • Eric has been on vacation—next meeting is this coming Thursday.
10 minJDF / ToIP Deliverable LifecycleDarrell O'Donnell 

Darrell gave a short presentation about the deliverable process, particularly for technical specifications.

He started with this wiki page: ToIP Deliverable Types, Stages, and Processes — see screenshot #1 below.

He then showed this Miro diagram that contains flowcharts showing each stage in the process. See screenshot #2 for the Working Draft stage.

Darrell noted that for technical specifications, the document MUST go into GitHub (using Spec-Up) before it goes into wider review, i.e., an Implementers Draft or a Public Review Draft.

ACTION: Kevin Griffin, Darrell O'Donnell, and Drummond Reed to add Darrell's diagrams and any other updates to our deliverable process documentation on the ToIP wiki.

5 minUpdates to ToIP reposKevin Griffin 

Kevin is archiving inactive repos and adopting standard naming conventions. See screenshot #3 and

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kr0OR6tnHqIwj9JrlQq62hbmOCcCUkxKoxZNpVyPfDs/edit#gid=0

All of our repos are subject to the EasyCLA process.

After Kevin performs archiving, we will be left with roughly a dozen active repos.

Kevin will also do a new fork of the DIF Spec-Up repo in order to create the standard ToIP spec template.

5 minSpec-Up Template & ToIP Glossary status

Chairs

Brief report on the development of our standard template for Spec-Up (based on the work of the new Specification Template Task Force) and the integration of external reference to the ToIP Glossary (which now has a new Markdown version).

Darrell recorded a Loom video about how to use Spec-Up.

Henk van Cann pointed out that keeping terms harmonized can be challenging.


Terminology Governance GuideHenk van Cann Henk has started a Spec-Up document 
5 min
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)

#1


#2


#3


#4



#5



#6



#7



#8



#9



#10


Decisions

  • Sample Decision Item

Action Items

  • Sample Action Item


  • No labels