Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Meeting Date

  •  

Zoom Meeting Link / Recording

Attendees

Main Goal of this Meeting

Start planning for developing and publishing the ToIP Technology Architecture Specification as a Core Four deliverable.

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
5 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:
15 minsTask Force ReportsTF Leads

Trust Registry TF — Darrell O'Donnell

  • The protocol is ready to be circulated.
  • GCCN has reviewed it and Vitor has done a simple implementation.
  • We discussed getting reviews from folks in the EU SSI communities.
    • Antti Kettunen will share the link with others in the Findy community.
  • Daniel Bachenheimer will share it with ESSIF, EBSI, and INATBA
  • ACTION: Darrell O'Donnell

ACDC TF — Sam Smith Philip Feairheller 

  • IIW TODO

Design Principles TF — Drummond Reed

  • Progress was somewhat delayed by Internet Identity Workshop last week, but the first draft of the Design Principles for the ToIP Stack should be completed this week.
  • Work is starting on revised graphics throughout—see the agenda items below.
  • Antti Kettunen has made a comment on the second principle.
  • He is excited about building the "API of Me".

Technology Architecture TF — Drummond Reed

  • This TF is now going to start moving full speed — see agenda item below.
1 minApprove Design Principles for the ToIP Stack as Draft DeliverableChairs

Call for consensus:

15 minsInternet Identity Workshop Tech HighlightsAll IIW Attendees
  • Premature Standardization & Premature Interoperability (Darrell)
    • We still have a long ways to go forward on standards.
    • We have not done anything dead wrong, but we don't have real interoperability yet.
    • Six or seven governments are operating Hyperledger Indy and Hyperledger Aries code bases but are not yet actually fully portable.
    • Steve McCown pointed out that we have a limited set of companies and developers building out ToIP and they seem to be compartmentalized by platform.
    • Darrell agreed with Steve, but pointed out the Aries Interop Test Suite. He hopes that it will enable the different platform implementations to actually interop.
    • Darrell shared a story about the interop challenges in the geospatial mapping standards arena. All of the web mapping servers achieved interop at a specific version of the spec that proved to be sufficient for the market needs.
    • Steve agreed that the different platform implementations are all similar. His company has been using a Mozilla toolkit called Uniffi that can lets you use the same toolkit in multiple places. It provides something more stable across the multiple toolkits — it is the easiest way to take a common library and implement it everywhere.
    • Darrell would like Steve to share that with the Aries Interop effort.
    • Antti observed that the EU Digital Identity Wallet initiative is amplifying efforts around feature comparisons vs. ISO mDL standards. If we look too far down the road, we're going to lose the battle to ISO mDL.
  • mDL sessions — 
  • DIDComm — Drummond Reed
  • other sessions 
10 minsRevised ToIP stack graphicDrummond Reed
  • We are producing a new version of the static ToIP stack diagram to use with our Core Four deliverables.
  • We will review the proposed changes in this Google doc.
10 minsToIP Technology Architecture SpecificationDrummond Reed
  • This is the final deliverable in the Core Four.
  • One key task we can begin working on now is a technical diagram of the ToIP Technology Stack as a protocol stack—we need this for the Design Principles for the ToIP Stack paper.
  • Should we begin having weekly meetings of this TF in order to finish this deliverable in November?
  • Should we establish a ToIP Architects Council consisting of ToIP members who are recognized architects for decentralized digital trust infrastructure who we want closely reviewing this specification?
5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)

#1


Decisions

  • Sample Decision Item

Action Items

  • DARRELL to circulate TRTF (doc and Swagger) out to the TSWG community plus a few others (GCCN, Findy via Antti, EFWG, EU via André, Dan Bachenheimer eSSIF/EBSI/etc.)
  •  


  • No labels