Meeting Date
Zoom Meeting Link / Recording
Attendees
Main Goal of this Meeting
Review progress on the ToIP Term Tool, the proposed outline for the CTWG User Manual, and discuss the first proposed ToIP terms wikis.
Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)
| Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes |
| 5 min | - Start recording
- Welcome & antitrust notice
- Introduction of new members
- Agenda review
| Chairs | - Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
- New Members:
|
| 5 min | Review of previous action items | Chairs | - ACTION: Daniel Hardman will investigate if there is a simple solution for the V1 tool to support a glossary including more than one definition of the same term BUT indicating which is the authoritative definition.
- ACTION: Drummond Reed and Daniel Hardman to prepare at least an outline of the CTWG User Manual V1 based on the work already done on the Terms Wikis branch of our Confluence wiki and in the Markdown document Rieks Joosten has started.
- ACTION: Michel Plante to check with his contact about potential interest in our bounty by sharing the current writeup (knowing it will be revised).
|
| 10 min | Update on ToIP Term Tool glossary publishing process | Daniel Hardman | - See first item item above.
|
| 20 min | Review proposed outline for CTWG User Manual | Chairs | |
| 15 min | Discuss the first ToIP terms wikis | All | - Our very first terms wiki is our own: https://github.com/trustoverip/ctwg-terms/wiki/
- The question now is what other ToIP WGs want to create what terms wikis?
- The Governance Stack WG met last week and decided that they do not want to create their own terms wiki at this time, but would rather contribute to a shared ToIP community terms wiki.
- They would like the initial emphasis to be put on ToIP-community-wide terms.
- They felt that this would encourage harmonization early on the most terms that were most important to use consistently across all our deliverables.
- They felt that having one "general" or "core" set of terms would make it easier to distinguish when other scopes are really needed.
- They also wanted to collaborate with the CTWG on this initial terms wiki.
- Do we agree?
- If so, what do we want to call this ToIP community-wide terms wiki? Candidates:
- toip-terms
- toip-general-terms
- toip-core-terms
- Others
- Who wants to volunteer to help set up and start populating this terms wiki?
|
| 5 mins | - Review decisions/action items
- Planning for next meeting
| Chairs |
|
Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)
#1
Decisions
Action Items