• Start recording
• Welcome & antitrust notice
• Introduction of new members
• Agenda review

• Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
• New Members:

Updates of general interest to TATF members.

• MS meetings
  • TAS caused difficulty - too much info up front. The Credential in an OIDC context is their world. QUESTION for ToIP and TSWG is how do we help the OIDC realm folk step out from that model.
• The OIDC realm is the hardest consumer of the ToIP model. They have a model that mostly works in a very bounded (IAM, OIDC, SAML, etc.) realm. This will create resistance - and opportunity. 

Discussion of progress on the working draft of the ToIP Technology Architecture Specification. Links to all the relevant documents and diagrams:

• READONLY Google Doc - content has been moved..
• GitHub Issues - 
• PDF of the current GitHub content - LINK HERE>>
• TAS NEW WORKING DRAFT 03 Google doc version <== USE THIS VERSION STARTING AUGUST 17 for any comments to sections 1 thru 6
• TAS OLD WORKING DRAFT 02 Google Doc version <== DO NOT USE THIS VERSION (except temporarily Aug 18-20 to make comments in sections 7 onwards)
• Evolution of the ToIP Stack <== NEW proposed companion document
• ToIP Protocol Stack Diagrams (Google Slides) <== All of all our past diagrams (some of which have been copied to TAS Source Diagrams)
• TAS Source Diagrams (Google Slides) <== SOURCE DIAGRAMS used in the TAS
• TATF Google Drive Folder <== WHERE ALL OF THE ABOVE may be found
• TAS GitHub Markdown version
• TAS GitHub issues list

• Discuss how we will capture information.
  • GitHub Issues - preferred method
  • EMAIL - IPR Concerns (content only allows members only) - we have EXISTING METHODS 
• GitHub - versioned PDFs?

"About not being able to accept contribution from non members - what's the end outcome desired from "public review" then?

• Sankarshan

Great Question - if we are at PUBLIC REVIEW (we are NOT). 

DUBLIN - is an announcemnt of the need for broader ToIP Community to review, add. Additional:

• drive interest 
• OUTCOME:
  • Drive member and non-member input OR
  • member and "just-joined members" in order to comment/submit issue.
• NON Member Agreement - protects on IPR issue.
• EasyCLA - https://github.com/communitybridge/easycla

PARKED FOR NOW

• Non-verifiable credentials "We still don't have a use case for dealing with non-verifiable credentials (or an example of useful non-verifiable credentials)." Neil

• Review decisions/action items
• Planning for next meeting