Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
Meeting Date
Zoom Meeting Link / Recording
Attendees
Main Goal of this Meeting
Complete Working Draft 01 of the ToIP Trust Registry Protocol V1 Specification and advance it to Community Review Draft status.
Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)
| Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes |
| 5 min | - Start recording
- Welcome & antitrust notice
- Introduction of new members
- Agenda review
| Chairs | - Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
- New Members:
|
| 5 min | Review of previous action items | Chairs | - REQUIREMENTS
- ACTION: sankarshan will apply his suggested reorganization of the Requirements section.
- SCOPE
- ACTION: Darrell O'Donnell and Drummond Reed to capture our scope decisions in this section, including that TR metadata is out of scope for this version of the specification but is planned for a future version.
- ACTION: Jim StClair will draft some text for the Scope section about rules processing as a future feature.
- DATA MODEL
- ACTION: Darrell O'Donnell to propose a textual description of the data model that refers to Appendix A for the normative requirements.
- PROTOCOL
- APPENDIX A: OpenAPI Specification
- ACTION: Darrell O'Donnell to complete any other edits to the OpenAPI specification and then add the authoritative links to Appendix A for the Implementer's Draft.
- ACTION: John Walker to review the API and post feedback to our Slack channel.
- John did review the API and the three calls.
|
| 30 mins | Review of work on the Working Draft and closing open issues | All | - See the ToIP Trust Registry Protocol V1 Working Draft
- DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
- sankarshan added a table that organized the requirements into three sections.
- We discussed his remaining questions, particularly whether the Information Security should be a SHOULDs or MUSTs
- Antti Kettunen suggested that it should point to industry best practices as a SHOULD
- Jim StClair agreed that a SHOULD statement pointing to the
- ACTION: Drummond Reed to add a reference to the ToIP Governance Metamodel and its Information Trust related sections.
- ACTION: Drummond Reed to move any remaining requirements left in the Design Requirements section.
- SCOPE
- PROTOCOL
- We discussed the service block question
- We discussed the EGF vs. TR identifiers question
- The issue is the one or two
- John Walker was in favor of returning both.
|
| 5 mins | Terminology & Glossary | Drummond Reed | - We need to prepare our terminology for this spec
|
| 10 mins | Next steps in Community Review | Chairs | - What specifically are our goals in the community review stage?
- How often do we want to continue meeting?
|
| 5 mins | - Review decisions/action items
- Planning for next meeting
| Chairs |
|
Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)
#1
Decisions
Action Items