Technology Architecture TF — Wenjing Chu  Drummond Reed

• Work continues on the ToIP Glossary Workspace — it is now probably 85% complete. Drummond's contributions will taper off the month of May due to the spring conference season, so full completion may need to wait until June. But there will be a Terminology Workshop in the Trust Spanning Protocol TF on May 3 (see below).
• Good feedback on TAS requirements is coming from the Trust Spanning Protocol TF. That process is also likely to continue into June.
• Work continues on developing a third-generation conceptual ToIP stack diagram.
• Tooling (github) being worked on.

Trust Registry TF — Andor Antti Kettunen  Darrell O'Donnell

•  EU comparisons
  • EUDI ARF - https://www.intesigroup.com/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2023/02/ARF_v100_for_publication_SqMV8FwSeE3xg7teicYY4hFDY_93678.pdf
  • TRAIN (TRust mAnagement INfrastructure) is here: https://essif-lab.eu/essif-train-by-fraunhofer-gesellschaft/
  • ACTION: Open Banking registries (jurisdiction by jurisdiction) - good Trust Registry examples that are operational.
  • ACTION: OpenID Federation Spec - similar goals. Dima Postnikov  will look at.

Trust Spanning Protocol TF — Drummond Reed Wenjing Chu Sam Smith (Daniel Hardman Emeritus)

• Daniel Hardman will be stepping back to Emeritus status due to his workload.
• Two TSP Workshops have been held, both very productive in driving towards key design decisions.
• A third TSP Workshop is planned for Thursday May 4.
• Oskar van Deventer and TNO have offered to host a Terminology Design Workshop for the TSPTF during our NA/EU meeting time on May 3. This should be an excellent lesson in developing/refining the terminology we need.

ACDC TF — Sam Smith Philip Feairheller 

• no update - IIW-ismation dominated.

AI & Metaverse (AIM) Technology TF — Wenjing Chu Vikas Malhotra 

• Identity is dominating aspect
  • Avatar behaviour over time is a giveaway (recognizable) - 
  • Dan "biometrics" Bachenheimer - how do we meet the needs (e.g. age limits, financial txns) (have/are/know)
  • ACTION: Dan to schedule some time about how the biometrics world is looking at this.  Binding is critical - but being prescriptive/descriptive 
    • LoA - EUDI "high" 2+ of 3 factors (have/are/know)

Mathieu will present his proposed charter for this task force to produce a comparison guide to existing protocols for exchange of verifiable credentials. → Credential Exchange Protocol Comparison Task Force

• decision matrix - answering "what's the best?" - for what?
• Kudra, Torsten and Paul Bastian etc.- did similar work on credential comparisons formats in Rebooting the Web of Trust (11) - https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot11-the-hague/blob/master/draft-documents/credential-profile-comparison.md 
• Aries, OID4VC, ISO 18013-5, and VC API communities are interested.
• Assuming Approval:
  • ACTION: mathieu to coordinate meeting times - considering existing meetings (including DIF perhaps). Michelle can assist here including getting a "join ToIP" link for email. 
  • ACTION: BLOG (by Friday, 2023-04-28) to get it out before EIC if desired.
  • ACTION: Daniel Bachenheimer will see if he can share internal (Accenture) analysis that is similar.
• input from Tim - Standard Council of Canada Digital Credentials https://www.scc.ca/en/flagship/digital-credentials 
  • particularly for conformity.
• APAC - https://www.lfph.io/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Verifiable-Credentials-Flavors-Explained.pdf
  • Kaliya led this.

From TAS Efforts - early draft: