Attendees
Co-Leads:
- --
ID2020 PM:
- Todd Gehrke
Participants:
- Dan Bachenheimer
- John Garratt
- Scott Perry
- Paul Murdock
- Rob Haslam
Agenda Items
| Time | Item | Who |
|---|---|---|
| 2 min | Welcome & Antitrust Policy Notice | Todd |
| XY min | Introductions to new member | All |
| XY min | Review Document feedback | Todd - All |
| 3 min | Wrap up | Chair |
Presentations -
(PDFs posted)
Recording - Link
Notes
1. Welcome and Linux Foundation antitrust policy
The comments have been moved into the Identity Binding Drafting Group drive into this document Identity Binding (Group 8) - V1.1
We had the meeting today and went through and accepted the appropriate edits. The comments made by Charlie Walton were added to the appropriate sections and assigned to editors
- Reference made to 6 identity assurance frameworks, but others around the globe. Is mentioning these needed (and if so are we being incomplete in not pointing to others) – this is about being inclusive, complete globally.
- There is a statement “those with limited evidence of their identity must be served with equivalence to those with the strongest forms”. Surely if the Federal Republic of Utopia has a policy that indicates only those vaccinated completely and who have had 1 government identity document verified at the time of jab; then those with limited evidence of their identity are by government policy rejected. Might be misreading this statement, but seems off.
- The examples in the text seem UK skewed; is that appropriate given the global audience? Understand that this is for illustration, but the optics might not be right.
- What is the minimal essential data to be included in a ‘pass’ regarding identity binding activity in the prior zones – how is this communicated (i.e. what checks done, where, to what IIL/AAL standards-specifics….).
- Similar comment on timing 30/90/180 day as other sections.
- Glossary can be removed; diagram p14 needs to be more clear visually.
Action Items
- Dan and Scott have been assigned comments to clear