Attendees

Co-Leads:

--

ID2020 PM:

Todd Gehrke

Participants:

Dan Bachenheimer
John Garratt
Scott Perry
Paul Murdock
Elizabeth Evenden-Kenyon
Andrew

Agenda Items

Time	Item	Who
2 min	Welcome & Antitrust Policy Notice	Todd
XY min	Introductions to new member	All
XY min	Review Document feedback	Todd - All
3 min	Wrap up	Chair

Presentations -

(PDFs posted)

Recording - Link

Notes

1. Welcome and Linux Foundation antitrust policy

The comments have been moved into the Identity Binding Drafting Group drive into this document Identity Binding (Group 8) - V1.1

We had the meeting today and went through and accepted the appropriate edits. The comments made by Charlie Walton were added to the appropriate sections and assigned to editors

Reference made to 6 identity assurance frameworks, but others around the globe. Is mentioning these needed (and if so are we being incomplete in not pointing to others) – this is about being inclusive, complete globally.
There is a statement “those with limited evidence of their identity must be served with equivalence to those with the strongest forms”. Surely if the Federal Republic of Utopia has a policy that indicates only those vaccinated completely and who have had 1 government identity document verified at the time of jab; then those with limited evidence of their identity are by government policy rejected. Might be misreading this statement, but seems off.
The examples in the text seem UK skewed; is that appropriate given the global audience? Understand that this is for illustration, but the optics might not be right.
What is the minimal essential data to be included in a ‘pass’ regarding identity binding activity in the prior zones – how is this communicated (i.e. what checks done, where, to what IIL/AAL standards-specifics….).
Similar comment on timing 30/90/180 day as other sections.
Glossary can be removed; diagram p14 needs to be more clear visually.

Action Items

Dan and Scott have been assigned comments to clear

Browser not supported