Time

Agenda Item

Lead

Notes

5 min

• Start recording

• Welcome & antitrust notice

• Introduction of new members

• Agenda review

Chairs

• Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.

• New Members:

5 min

Review of previous action items

Chairs

• Wiki

5-10 min

Updated Spec PR

Andor Kesselman

Language Improvements To the Spec: https://github.com/trustoverip/tswg-trust-registry-protocol/pull/86

Github Hygiene

Andor Kesselman

Github Hygene Hygiene :

• Add To Milestones For Public Review

• Close/Resolve all old issues (30+)

• Clear old/dead branches

Outcome:

1. A single branch

2. Only relevant issues are still live.

3. All old PR’s should be closed.

10 mins

Updated Diagrams

Drummond Reed

Wiki UpdatedToIP Trust Registry Query Protocol (TRQP) Specification Overview

• What is in a trust registry section added

• Intro shortened.

10 mins

DICE Updates

• [DR] Used wiki at DICE. Good feedback.

• [DD] Lots of Trust Registry conversations going on.

  • TRAIN was very active there.

  • TRAIN/Issac : TRQP to train.

• [DD] Trust Service Providers and Swiss e-ID team.

  • Non government use cases. Enablers not controllers.

• [DR] Supposed to be focused on ecosystems

• [DR] Nationstate level, getting about ecosystems

• [DR] Lack of ecosystems showing up.

• [DR] 1.6 Version of ARF got released.

• [DR] 90 min sessions.

• [DR] Lots of people complaining.

• [SP] eIDAS 2.0 is an example of over-governance

• [DR] Unlinkability requirements are challenging.

• [DR] BBS not a EU standard yet

• [DR] Batch issuance : Verifier/Issuer collusion.

• [DR] ZKP the only answer here.

• [DR] How is the EU going to operate with the rest of the world?

  • PID and all the ways to protect that.

  • Low frequency use cases.

  • Interoperability issues.

• [DO] Students moving from EU to Japan

• [SP] A lot of countries have the own agenda.

• [SP] A way to do this is iterative. Big bang for implementers to implement.

• [SP] Iterative standards are important.

• [AK] Will ecosystems benefit from the model?

  • [DO] Business’s are thinking about it as silos

  • [DO] Trying to force it won’t work.

  • [DR]: “Daniel Säuberli’s request — called “What is a digital trust ecosystem and how do you connect them”

  • [DR]: To get relying parties to the table, value circle of the ecosystems need to be clear.

    • TR’s are a piece of that.

  • [DO] “What is a digital trust ecosystem and how do you connect them”

    • It’s not a helpful question unless you as a party in an ecosystem of ecosystems understand:

      • That they are an ecosystem in a set of ecosystems

      • That they need each other

      • That there is a safe place to talk about the problems

    • [Sankarshan] It often turns into “am I (or are we) part of a digital trust ecosystem?” Before the “ecosystem thinking” kicks in.

5 mins

• Review decisions/action items

• Planning for next meeting 

Chairs

• Consider APAC call

  • John Phillips

  • Alex Tweedale

  • Send out a slack message later.

• Close all motion to close tickets by next meeting assuming no action.

  • Callout to slack to review any issue.

• Linux Foundation Looking For Updates

  • Where should we point to?:

    • https://trustoverip.github.io/tswg-trust-registry-protocol/

    • ToIP Trust Registry Query Protocol (TRQP) Specification Overview

  • [DR] Blog Post : Can provide context and the overview

    • Template for that?

    • [DR] Take the action item to figure out how to prepare the blog post.

    • [ED] Blog post up before LF?

      • March 18, 2025 : Highlight new members

      • Storyline to LFDT and ToIP

  • Wikipage for announcements

• [AK] Won’t it get lost with the other annoucements

• [DR] Be on the lookout