Page Comparison

• Start recording
• Welcome & antitrust notice
• New member introductions
• Agenda review

• Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
• New Members: None

Discussion centred on how might we move towards a single representation of the governance architecture for ToIP.

Full transcript and video recording links above.

Summary of the key points and agreed actions from the meeting (generated by ChatGPT4 from the meeting transcript and edited by hand thereafter):

Key Points:

1. Initial Greetings and Time Zones: The meeting begins with casual greetings among participants, discussing the early hour of the meeting for some attendees, notably Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay.

2. Backdrop and Seasonal Themes: Drummond Reed talks about changing his virtual backgrounds for different meetings and discusses the upcoming holiday break, implying a pause in meetings.

3. Content Authenticity Initiative Symposium: Drummond shares his experience at the Stanford symposium, highlighting its relevance to Trust over IP's work. He notes the synergy between this initiative and Trust over IP, emphasizing the importance of content authenticity in digital trust ecosystems.

4. United Nations Projects: John Phillips discusses the parallels between Trust over IP, the digital passport concept, and United Nations projects on supply chain transparency, emphasizing the synergy in their goals and approaches.

5. Governance Architecture Discussion: The group delves into discussions about representing governance architecture. Different perspectives are presented, including John Phillips' molecular structure concept, Scott Perry’s risk mitigation framework, and Kyle's real-world application examples.

6. Conceptualization of Overlays: There’s a significant focus on how to effectively conceptualize and visualize the governance architecture, with ideas about using overlays to represent different aspects of the architecture.

7. Consumer Perspective and Practicality: Sankarshan emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the governance architecture is understandable and relevant from a consumer perspective, focusing on end-user applications like wallets and digital credentials.

8. Next Steps and Future Meetings: The group discusses plans for continuing the work, including setting up a new deck for ideas and suggestions, and aligning on meeting schedules post-holidays.

Agreed Actions:

1. Creation of a New Deck: A new deck will be started to gather ideas and suggestions for the governance architecture visualization.

2. Contributions to Overlays: Drummond Reed commits to drafting proposals for the technology stack side of the architecture, focusing on how each layer might be expanded in detail.

3. Further Exploration of Concepts: Participants agree to explore and refine concepts like wallets, digital credentials, and trust tasks, and how they span across the layers of the architecture.

4. Communication and Coordination: The group plans to communicate and coordinate efforts with other members and related projects, ensuring alignment and synergies.

5. Next Meeting Planning: The next meeting is scheduled for approximately four weeks later, taking into account the holiday break. The need to re-establish recurring meetings for the new year is noted.

The meeting effectively balances technical discussions with practical considerations, emphasizing the importance of making the architecture accessible and relevant to a wider audience.

• Review decisions/action items
• Planning for next meeting