Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Meeting Date

Check the ToIP Calendar for meeting dates.

Zoom Meeting Link / Recording

Attendees

Main Goal of this Meeting

Wrap up work to early 2024, specify work for remainder of the year

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
5 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:
5 mins

The

meeting centered

key points, decisions, and action items from the meeting can be summarized as follows:

  1. Discussion on Governance and Risk Management:

    • The meeting focused on the governance
and risk assessment
    • model for
an
    • the attraction pass project,
involving the integration of verifiable credentials and self-sovereign identity concepts. The participants were:Scott Perry: Discussed the governance risk assessment process,
    • emphasizing the need for a
thorough risk assessment
    • well-defined governance structure to manage
and mitigate potential risks associated with the attraction pass. He detailed the process of risk assessment, including identifying risks, analyzing their severity and likelihood, and determining the overall risk score. Scott also highlighted the importance of having a governance framework to guide the ecosystem and manage risks effectively.
  • Tony Sandler: Raised questions about the timeline and purpose of the risk assessment exercise and suggested sequencing the project activities to ensure that the ecosystem plan is finalized before focusing on governance. He stressed the need for stress-testing the current plans and adapting them based on feedback.

  • Neil Thomson: Contributed by sharing a real-world context related to major league baseball ticketing, highlighting the importance of addressing risks associated with ticket distribution and fraud prevention. He suggested focusing on technology discussions and then moving into risk assessment to ensure major risks are addressed.

  • Kabir Maiga: Participated in clarifying how the governance risk assessment process would apply to the ecosystem, looking into specific examples like control of private keys and the need for auditing and compliance to mitigate risks.

  • Key Points, Decisions, and Action Items:

    • Governance and Risk Assessment: The need for a comprehensive governance framework and risk assessment was emphasized, focusing on the importance of managing risks associated with the attraction pass. The discussion covered the governance risk assessment process, including the use of a governance meta model and the assessment of risks based on severity and likelihood.

    • Integration of Technology and Governance: Participants discussed the integration of technological solutions with governance practices to address and mitigate risks effectively. This includes the use of verifiable credentials and self-sovereign identity to ensure the security and reliability of the attraction pass.

    • Real-World Context and Examples: The discussion included real-world examples, such as ticketing for major league baseball, to highlight potential risks and the importance of addressing them in the attraction pass ecosystem.

    • Action Items: The primary action item from the meeting is to finalize the ecosystem plan for the attraction pass before focusing on the governance aspect. This involves stress-testing current plans, adapting them based on external expertise and feedback, and ensuring that technology discussions precede risk assessment to address major risks adequately.

    Draft 2024 Planning Document: Attraction Pass - Summary of WTD and 2024 Plans
      • risks and ensure smooth operations. The participants discussed the roles of various stakeholders and the importance of clear guidelines and responsibilities.
    1. Trust and Verification Process:

      • A significant part of the conversation revolved around establishing trust among stakeholders, especially between ticket buyers and sellers. The discussion highlighted the necessity of a verifiable credential system to authenticate stakeholders' identities and roles effectively.
    2. Use of Trust Registries and Delegated Authority:

      • The concept of using trust registries for verifying stakeholders and managing delegated authority within the ecosystem was explored. This approach would enable a structured verification process, ensuring that transactions and interactions within the ecosystem are secure and trustworthy.
    3. Ticket Resale and Transfer Mechanism:

      • The participants debated mechanisms for ticket resale and transfer, stressing the importance of a secure and authorized process. It was suggested that transfers should be managed through an official agent to prevent fraud and unauthorized resales.
    4. Technical Solutions and Implementation Details:

      • Technical aspects of implementing the discussed systems, such as the synchronization of passes between issuers and holders, and the use of secure containers for data, were considered. The discussions covered potential technical solutions and the need for further development in certain areas.
    5. Future Steps and Presentation Preparation:

      • The meeting concluded with plans to prepare a presentation outlining the project's governance model, trust mechanisms, and technical implementation. This presentation aims to solicit feedback from the broader community and stakeholders within the industry.

    Participants and Contributions:

    • Neil Thomson: Contributed to the discussion on governance models, trust mechanisms, and technical solutions.
    • Tony Sandler: Discussed the importance of trust registries and the verification process.
    • Carl Smith: Provided insights into ticket resale mechanisms and the implementation of verifiable credentials.
    • Kaliya Identity Woman (Kaliya Young): Shared experiences and perspectives on trust frameworks and their implementation in different contexts.

    The action items include finalizing the governance model, developing a detailed plan for the trust and verification process, and preparing the presentation for broader community feedback.