Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

This TF schedules meetings as needed. Each meeting will be announced on the GSWG mailing list and the #governance-architecture-tf Slack channel.

The current (Feb 2023) cadence is that there are two GATF meetings every two weeks:

Wednesday at 7pm EST/4pm PDT/Thursday 9am AEST
Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/94290110805?pwd=OEVhd2IwUUxTblNtYUNOVEtGaUNBUT09

Thursday at 6pm AEST/10am CEST/3pm GMT+7h
https://zoom.us/j/97765626957?pwd=L2RFRmczTlpoWS9RQkhwaUdjaVpHdz09

The meetings (and Zoom links) are available on the ToIP meeting calendar
https://wiki.trustoverip.org/display/HOME/Calendar+of+ToIP+Meetings

...

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
3 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • New member introductions
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members: Andrew Piscione
2 minReview of previous action itemsChairs#### THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT / PLACEHOLDER AT PRESENT

Topic #1

Carly led a discussion provided an update on the "Trust Registry Catalogue Data" document review: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kFeti37GjfoclRtJsiRwPG10-6zoZ7kQ9AiPkytX7r4/edit#heading=h.1059kkeqxc2rPoints discussed included whether the document title should indicate the type of document (whitepaper, discussion paper, requirements document, implementation guide, companion guide etc.) as well as detail elements such as changing DID to VID and whether each registry element should always have its own DID/VID


Topic #2

Following on the discussion on the document, John introduced John led a discussion on the need for the GATF to define an architecture for governance in which the above document can be placed. Proposing that we all seem to agree that a "Trust Registry" of some sort is an essential element, but that we need to show how this element "fits in" to the overall context of the governance architectureThis then led to a suggestion that each participant in the meeting could try to "draw" or sketch what they think the governance architecture might look like.Governance Architecture - how might we draw one?

Neil offered examples of different perspectives

The group explored the 4 layer 2 stack model of ToIP and observed that, absent any other elements, governance in this context means governance of the technology.

Scott shared insights from the Identity Week, including the ecosystem being set up by the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators https://www.aamva.org/


Topic #3


Topic #4


5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs


...