Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

Time	Agenda Item	Lead	Notes
3 min	Start recording Welcome & antitrust notice New member introductions Agenda review	Leads	Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role. New Members:
2 min	Review of previous action items	Leads	ACTION: Drummond Reed to start a GitHub discussion on the question of TSP Workshops and also add it to the agenda for our March 22 meeting.
5 mins	Last Call for Proposals & prep for "TSP Workshops"	Drummond Reed	After today's Proposal #4 from Michael Michael and next week's Proposal #3 Part B from Wenjing Chu, we are asking if there are any other proposals in our proposal stage. If so, please speak up now or contact Drummond Reed this coming week so we can get you on the schedule. ACTION: Drummond Reed to send an email to the Technology Stack WG mailing list and post to the ToIP Slack with a Last Call for Proposals. Secondly, Neil Thomson and others have suggested that as we move into our consolidation stage, we are going to need one or more "Special TSP Workshops" of at least 2-3 hour duration. We hope to begin scheduling these in early April — and possibly hold a hybrid in-person/virtual workshop during Internet Identity Workshop (April 18-21).
40 mins	Proposal #4: Michael Herman	Michael Michael	See this discussion thread that Michael started on Feb 22 for links, slides, and Q&A. Also, several of Michael's slides are captured in screenshots below. Here is the recording of Michael's presentation in the NA/EU meeting. Here is the recording of Michael's presentation in the APAC meeting.
10 mins	Q&A on the above.	All	Q&A on the NA/EU call is captured on the Zoom recording. Notes from Q&A on the APAC call: Wenjing Chu asked if Michael was proposing to use: a) DIDComm V2, and b) did he specifically include Verifiable Credentials? Michael said, "Yes, it can be DIDComm V2" and "No, it doesn't include Verifiable Credentials". But Michael clarified that it does include DIDComm V2 attachments. So Michael's proposal is "essentially DIDComm V2". Tahoe Blue asked how Michael's proposal differed from TCP/IP routing and messaging. Michael said that his proposal is a higher level protocol that packet exchange. So it is a message routing and queuing would operate at a higher layer and supports disconnected clients. Tahoe Blue asked if it resembled Kafka. Jo Spencer shared that Kafka is a message protocol operating over MQ. Jo Spencer asked, "Are we only concerned about trust in the message component, or does it also extend to the data component." Michael referenced his slide shown in screenshot #7 below. Michael also clarified that his term "superprotocols" applies to agent-to-agent protocols that build on DIDComm. Jo Spencer felt that Michael should externalize his calls to trust foundations (what Michael is called subprotocols).
	Review decisions/action items Planning for next meeting	Leads	Next week's meeting will be Wenjing Chu presenting Proposal #3 Part B.