Time

Agenda Item

Lead

Notes

5 min

• Start recording

• Welcome & antitrust notice

• Introduction of new members

• Agenda review

Chairs

• Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.

• In addition to the licensing terms of this Working Group’s JDF charter, this Working Group operates under the official policy that any Working Group Participant who makes a contribution to a Draft Deliverable shall have a maximum of 45 days from the date of that contribution to exclude any Essential Claims pertaining to that contribution.

• New Members:

5 min

Review of previous action items

Chairs

• Nicholas: registries concept

• Scott: assistance on TR implementation into CAWG spec

10

Update on Specification Approval

@Darrell O'Donnell 

Update on Steering Committee vote from 2026.04.15

10 mins

Post-Approval Actions

@Darrell O'Donnell

Multiple things need to happen post SC-vote

IMMEDIATELY:

• PR merged - Document is live: https://trustoverip.github.io/tswg-trust-registry-protocol/

  • (PR was already approved by @Drummond Reed, but we needed the SC vote results)

• DOI at Zenodo - Darrell & Carly will get this handled

  • Q to @Carly Huitema - what happens when/if TRQP v2.0 is revised. In the academic world this would be similar to an errata and re-publishing.

• Permalink NOT working yet - ToIP Webmaster - Darrell & Carly will coordinate to get this published at a permalink location

  •  

LATER:

• Tag the release as ToIP Approved v2.0

• SpecUp - need to see if we can create a dual (v2.0 ToIP Approved and any “live draft” version.

• SpecUp-T migration

10 mins

What is Next?

• Re-opening Sankarshan’s tickets other backlogged issues.

  • Review past inputs and thinking about what we need to do

• Recognition and Socialization of the Spec

• @Darrell O'Donnell needs to start Blog Post

Sankarshan:

• Thread & Issues - review for TRQP path ahead

  • Doesn’t necessarily change the TRQP Core (e.g Discovery sits on top of core)

  • High-Level Vision: https://github.com/trustoverip/tswg-trust-registry-protocol/issues/175

  •  

• Domain Expertise - content/guidance for secure deployment (is that a ToIP thing? Ayra/etc. thing?)

• OpenSSF, Cloud Security Alliance

Scott:

• need feedback from TRQP in use -

• Sankarshan: TRQP upstream of implentations (e.g. Ayra, CAWG)

• e.g. Ayra TRQP Profile

• e.g. UWI (NTT, Accenture) uses TRP v1.0 (pre-cursor to TRQP v2.0) because it has the administrative features they need: listing entities, lookups, etc.

  • NOTE: those are now surfaced in the Ayra TRQP Profile

  • https://ayraforum.github.io/ayra-trust-registry-resources/api.html

• Test Suites - how does a provider certify they meet the criteria of a TRQP-enabled system?

  • Ayra can share here (https://github.com/ayraforum/conformance-test-suite )

• CAWG Trust TF - monday before IIW (8-9 PT)

CAWG:

• “governance assertion” - who is the governing authority (in the asset itself)

What is next:

5 mins

• Review decisions/action items

• Planning for next meeting 

Chairs