Atlassian uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, perform analytics and research, and conduct advertising. Accept all cookies to indicate that you agree to our use of cookies on your device. Atlassian cookies and tracking notice, (opens new window)
Recordings: you can find them in LFX calendar (along with transcripts). We no longer manually add the links here.
Attendees:
@Nicky Hickman
@Eric Drury
@Jim Mason
@Makki Elfatih
@Drummond Reed
@Neil Thomson
@jeff Braswell
@shafayet Ahmed
@Jim St.Clair
Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)
Time
Agenda Item
Lead
Notes
5 mins
Welcome & antitrust notice
Introduction of new members
Agenda review
Recording with transcription is now automatic
Chairs
Antitrust Policy Notice:Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws.
ToIP Policy: Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
@Jim Mason mentioned the idea of ‘zero faith’ infrastructure extension of zero trust
@Neil Thomson Interesting conversation with AI as described by John Phillips (SEZOO, Australia) - opinions by AI on different Digital ID implementations - Utah, UK and one EU implementations
How did AI arrive on their decisions - was it based on examining the specs and other technical and governance documentation OR on opinions express in social media and public media?
While AI can sound like they've done the reasoning, currently that would be misleading So sources of AI reasoning are critical - agree with the Bhutan case from Eric
zero trust (everything you understand it to be), zero faith is e.g., MS Crowdstrike problem, everything has gaps in reality therefore you assume the worst will happen.
@Neil Thomson In otherwords, trust/faith needs to be based on on risk assessment
@Jim St.Clair commented that this included real world use cases from state CIO’s and CTO’s - opportunity to reach out with potential AI solutions
Includes practical advice on changes to be made
@Jim Mason raised desire to raise ‘hall of fame’ for the world’s crappiest chat bot, you can rank them in terms of accuracy, efficiency and other dimensions, QoS and support is lacking. Compared to Apple, they are B+ or A-, personalised for example to 72 native languages. @Neil Thomson suggested ‘hall of shame’.
@Jim Mason gave example of features like ‘off-ramps’ being important for good QoS bots.
0 mins
Action Items
ALL
List action items to follow up
AIMWG in Google Drive is still under Tech Stack WFG - needed to elevate AIM to WG level