Participants:
| Time | Item | Who |
|---|---|---|
| 2 min | Welcome & Antitrust Policy Notice | Chair |
| XY min | Topic A | TBC |
| XY min | Topic B | TBC |
| XY min | Topic C | TBC |
| 3 min | Wrap up | Chair |
(PDFs posted)
1. Welcome and Linux Foundation antitrust policy
First principal of the GHPC trust registry is that each EGF is a root-of-trust with their own trust registry. This is same model that the WWW ended up with a set of ~500 CAs
There is work underway called TRAIN, we have looked at it and it might be overkill for what we are trying to do.
<insert diagram here>
Each VC contains a type prosperity which we can use as the types of creds an issuer might be authorized to provide.
This takes us to the “Triple”
Who maintains the top level trust list
[Julliam] In the 30 day time frame GHPC would need to maintain the trust registry.
<Action> We need to discuss the options of how we would operationalize a TR
Also need to continue the discussion about certification and the trust assurance framework.
Saveta shared some diagrams from the rules engine channel that would be good to include
<>
https://essif-lab.pages.grnet.gr/framework/docs/terms/pattern-jurisdiction
2. Topic A
3. Topic B
4. Topic C
5. Wrap up
Action Items