Meeting Date

11 Nov 2021

Zoom Meeting Link / Recording

https://zoom.us/j/99376159509?pwd=UlNyZWFNbDBnanFPeVBablNzdXpBZz09
(This link will be replaced with a link to the recording of the meeting as soon as that is available)

Attendees

Main Goal of this Meeting

Review new ToIP protocol stack diagram submissions and (if Daniel Hardman is able to attend) discuss how our requirements for the "hourglass neck" protocol compare to the requirements for DIDComm V2.

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

Time	Agenda Item	Lead	Notes
5 min	Start recording Welcome & antitrust notice Introduction of new members Agenda review	Chairs	Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role. New Members:
5 min	Review of previous action items	Chairs	ACTION: ALL — Please review the Community Review draft of Design Principles for the ToIP Stack in the next week. ACTION: Drummond Reed to draw a new version of the "waist and neck" diagram showing multiple transport layer protocol options. ACTION: Drummond Reed to talk with Daniel Hardman to prep for a discussion of DIDComm at the next meeting.
15 mins	Quick summary of new ToIP protocol stack diagrams added this past week	Diagram authors ==>	New diagrams (links go directly to the slides in the ToIP Protocol Stack Diagrams slide deck): Antti Kettunen here Scott Perry here Daniel Hardman here and here Drummond Reed (building on Sam Smith, Wenjing Chu & Daniel Hardman) here and here
30 mins	Discussion of the Hourglass Principle and DIDComm V2	Daniel Hardman	Daniel is one of the primary authors of DIDComm V1 and DIDComm V2. Topics to cover: Why and how does the Hourglass Model apply to the ToIP stack? What are the requirements for the "waist" protocol (the "trust spanning layer")? To what extent was DIDComm designed to meet those requirements? Is there any other protocol that is a good candidate to meet those requirements?
5 mins	Review decisions/action items Planning for next meeting	Chairs

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)

#1

Decisions

Sample Decision Item

Action Items

Sample Action Item

2021-11-11 TATF Meeting Notes