Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Meeting Date

  •  

Attendees

image2021-4-5_8-9-50.png

Main Goal of this Meeting:

SPECIAL MEETING to—if possible—finalize the ToIP Terms tooling specification and agree on the amount of a bounty to request from the ToIP Steering Committee.

Agenda 

TimeItemLeadNotes
5 min

Start recording
Welcome & Antitrust Policy Notice
Introduction of new members
Agenda review
Review/accept notes and action items of previous meeting

Chairs
5 minsProposed solution for attribution of contributionsDrummond ReedSee Notes section below
30 minsDiscussion of any remaining issues with the proposed ToIP Tool specificationDaniel HardmanSee list in the Notes section below
5 minsDECISION:  Do we have consensus on the spec and to proceed with a bounty request?Chairs
10 minsDetermining the amount of the proposed bounty requestChairs
5 minsReview of Decisions and Action Items and planning for next meeting Chairs

Recording

  • link to the file

Presentation(s)

  • link to the file

Documents

Notes

  1. New members
  2. Proposed solution for attribution of contributions
    1. In our internal data model, add two properties to the Definition of a Concept in a specific Scope
      1. URI identifying the Contributor for purposes of attribution
      2. URI identifying the License that applies to the Contribution
    2. This should allow us to cover all types of contributions under all forms of acceptable licenses that require attribution
    3. Michael Michaelsaid that this would not satisfy the requirements of the Creative Commons corpus.
    4. ACTION: Michael Michaelto propose a different set of properties that will fulfill the Creative Commons.
    5. ACTION: Drummond Reedto check with LF counsel about the use of a more restrictive CC BY SA license.
    6. ACTION: Drummond Reedto check with upstream providers, e.g., Sovrin Foundation, about using a less-restrictive license.
  3. Discussion of any remaining issues with the proposed ToIP Tool specification
    1. Do we agree with the internal data model?
    2. Do we agree with the requirements for how we link to data (hyperlinking)?
    3. Do we agree with the form factor: a command-line tool that lets us pipe data through one or more stages of transformations?
    4. Are there any other open issues?
  4. DECISION:  Do we have consensus on the spec and to proceed with a bounty request?
  5. Determining the amount of the proposed bounty request
  6. Review of Decisions and Action Items and planning for next meeting

Slides

#1 - 

Decisions

  • Sample Decision Item

Action Items

  • Sample Action Item


  • No labels