This TF schedules meetings as needed. Each meeting will be announced on the GSWG mailing list and the #governance-architecture-tf Slack channel.
The current cadence is that there are two GATF meetings every two weeks:
Wednesday at 7pm EST/4pm PDT/Thursday 9am AEST
Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/94290110805?pwd=OEVhd2IwUUxTblNtYUNOVEtGaUNBUT09
Thursday at 6pm AEST/10am CEST/3pm GMT+7h
https://zoom.us/j/97765626957?pwd=L2RFRmczTlpoWS9RQkhwaUdjaVpHdz09
The meetings (and Zoom links) are available on the ToIP meeting calendar
https://wikilf-toip.trustoveripatlassian.orgnet/wiki/display/HOME/Calendar+of+ToIP+Meetings
Zoom Meeting Links / Recordings
...
Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)
Chat notes
00:08:39 Neil Thomson: Example of an Issuer....
00:10:34 John Phillips: Apropos something Neil?
00:10:56 Neil Thomson: Issuing a gift pass, of course....
00:11:26 John Phillips: https://lf-toip.atlassian.net/wiki/display/HOME/2024-03-04+GATF+Meeting+Notes+-+Americas
00:15:15 John Phillips: This is the link that Neil shared on slack: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1l2Lus8HtvLFUNfxhiISnwG3wdHOUFCRAWb3gCeZZePc?usp=drive_fs
00:15:42 John Phillips: And this is the post itself: https://trustoverip.slack.com/archives/C054LDT6RFZ/p1709768193061149
00:28:07 Carly Huitema: two stacks, the digital stack and the trust stack :-)
00:31:39 Neil Thomson: https://www.tigtech.org/
00:33:55 Carly Huitema: afk, having to deal with a home crises
00:34:03 Drummond Reed: I love the tree!
00:42:04 Carly Huitema: In the ecosystem we have settled on different components.
00:42:43 Carly Huitema: Replying to "In the ecosystem we ..."
Context
Governance (plural)
Trusted Parties (Verifiable Identifiers)
Trusted Data / (Verifiable Credentials)
Trust Anchor(s) Root(s)?
Trust Interactions / Tasks
Trust Support Systems (Protocols and Technologies)
00:48:31 Carly Huitema: Replying to "In the ecosystem we ..."
issuers, holders and verifiers are all trusted parties
00:52:00 Drummond Reed: Replying to "In the ecosystem we ..."
It sounds like I should explain more about the ToIP Technology Architecture Specification definition of the four layers. That’s what led to the icons on the left.
00:52:37 Carly Huitema: Replying to "In the ecosystem we ..."
So.... to the Ecosystem
Trusted Parties (with issuers, holders, verifiers)
Trust Anchors (with Trust Registry operators)
Context (including business models etc.)
00:52:45 Judith Fleenor: Reacted to "It sounds like I sho..." with 👍
00:53:18 Carly Huitema: Replying to "In the ecosystem we ..."
And Trusted Data
All completing
Trust Tasks
01:00:00 Carly Huitema: If I see this tree I might be primed to try and find apps, tasks, spanning and support as each of the 4 layers
01:00:38 John Phillips: Plants do tend to have fractal structures, but that might be going too far!
01:00:45 Carly Huitema: Reacted to "Plants do tend to ha..." with 😂
01:00:48 Drummond Reed: Replying to "If I see this tree I..."
Not sure I understand that, Carly?
01:00:56 Drummond Reed: Reacted to "Plants do tend to ha..." with 😂
01:01:20 Carly Huitema: Replying to "If I see this tree I..."
patterns that appear at macro scales also appear repeated at micro scales
01:01:26 Judith Fleenor: As simple as the attraction pass “Simple” LOL
01:01:36 Drummond Reed: Replying to "If I see this tree I..."
Ah, fractal, yes
01:01:40 Carly Huitema: Replying to "If I see this tree I..."
Like governance at large scale also looks like governance of smaller
01:03:54 Carly Huitema: I like this version - with the metamodel as a circle
01:04:44 Judith Fleenor: Will you be putting a link to this deck in the meeting notes?
Decisions
JP to add risk icon to governance stack, based on SP's earlier work
...
-
Exploration of Economics in Governance: The group agreed on the importance of incorporating economic considerations into governance models, recognizing it as a vital component for sustainable ecosystems. This includes examining business models, revenue flows, and the financial viability of governance structures.
-
Further Discussion on Machine Readable Governance: There was consensus on the potential benefits of developing machine-readable governance, albeit recognizing the challenges and the need for gradual progression towards more sophisticated implementations.
-
Engagement with Human Experience Working Group: Carly Huitema will continue to engage with the Human Experience Working Group to integrate considerations around navigating trust registries and enhancing user experience in verifying trust across ecosystems.
-
Documentation and Framework Development: Participants are encouraged to contribute to ongoing documentation efforts and framework development, particularly in areas concerning the integration of economics into governance models and exploring machine-readable governance mechanisms.