Versions Compared

Old Version 8

changes.mady.by.user Hakan Yildiz

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user mathieu

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  •   This Task Force meets every Wednesdays at 09:00-10:00 ET / 15:00-16:00 CET (see the Calendar of ToIP Meetings for full meeting logistics including Zoom links)

...

NA/EU Meeting

No APAC meeting.

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
3 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members: none.
30 minReview of TF objectives, deliverables and roadmapChairs

Review presentation:

Widget Connector
urlhttps://docs.google.com/presentation/d/11DbYVfpXwQrNzwKyDjucQZJ0WrE_ATk2EJ44_AT2zoQ/edit#slide=id.p

Review comparison matrix spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_KKQZmmNRnEME96fZCPbMW-TC9j0tQ-dVuk5zzKa8U8/edit#gid=485340784

Review OWF list: https://github.com/openwallet-foundation/architecture-sig/wiki/2023-06-12-Meeting-Minutes

A tutorial on the Interoperability of Self-sovereign Identities (whitepaper): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362581356_A_Tutorial_on_the_Interoperability_of_Self-sovereign_Identities

  •  ACTION:
25 minsOpen Discussion
  • Review list of criteria and ensure definitions allow for objective responses
  • Brainstorming functional properties
    • Hakan Yildiz Architecture dependencies (e.g., on layer 2 transport mechanisms) (e.g., client-server architectures vs p2p)
    • @Subhasis - Look at features (e.g., online/offline), architectures, support of credentials (e.g., mDL isn't W3C), regulatory compliance (eIDAS 2.0)
    • Judith Fleenor - once technical analysis done, possibility to create more high-level artifacts (e.g., infographics) targeted to less technical/business decision makers
    • Hakan Yildiz - need to come up with terminology (e.g., what does 'maturity' mean?, maybe there's a need to define nested standards within specification and implementation level)
    • Hakan Yildiz - logical operations and/or XOR (being able to make a cred request for 2 different credentials - e.g., show me a covid pass and national id in one cred exchange request)
    • @Subhasis - Rigidity and flexibility of protocol (e.g., how you can construct a proof request or issuance - comparing predicate proofs vs age proofs in mDL - mDL is rigid as issuer predefines the predicates - vs in Aries presentation exchange I can do greater than 1 or 2)
    • @Subhasis & Drummond Reed  - Do any of these protocols have implementation standards to help people adopting (e.g., best practices, test suites, certification programs which are signs of maturity)
    • Vladimir Simjanoski - combining protocols - such as creating a DIDComm connection and then using OpenID4VCI for an issuance flow
    • Drummond Reed - Identifiers supported (classic web ids vs decentralize ids, or AIDs as a sub-class of DIDs)
5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs



Decisions

Action Items

  •  ACTION: Migrate spreadsheet to ToIP Google Drive folder
  •  ACTION: Start discussion in GitHub around protocol list - what to cover, what not to cover
  •  ACTION: Start discussion in GitHub around criteria list


Notes

From CEPTF Meeting:

...