•  Sam Smith will pursue the IANA CESR MIME type registration within the ACDC TF
  •  Provisional registration is short-term
  •  Then work towards official registration
•  Drummond Reed will send updated Task Force information
•  Kevin Griffin is following up with ToIP Michelle Janata and Drummond Reed will be included.
•  We will appoint additional chairs (currently only Phil is listed) and maintainers
  •  Recommending co-chairs Stephen Curran Philip Feairheller Lance Byrd 
•  Lance Byrd will start an ACDC PR to the spec that describes anchoring
  
  •  Lance Byrd will provide an outline of how to use a TEL
•  Daniel Hardman will donate his dh1128 repo if ToIP will allow.... all commits are signed

News or events of interest to members:

• ToIP has approved the Open Web Foundation (OWF) IPR license
  • We are 15 21 days into the 60 day period
• This is an OFFICIAL TF as of Thursday night
  • From the TSWG:
    • ACTION: Drummond Reed to send an email to the TSWG mailing list notifying all TSWG members of a 7 day review period for the proposed DID WebS Method Task Force, followed by a 7-day email vote seeing if there are any objections.
    • ACTION: did:webs Task Force leads to contact Michelle Janata to add their Friday meeting onto ToIP calendar once the Task Force is officially approved
    • Chairs
      • Should be listed on the wiki page. 
    • Maintainers
      • Let Kevin know
  last Thursday night
• IIW October 2023
  • We aim to be registered did method and have an implementation in the Universal resolver
  • Note: there will also be a TSP for Muggles session at IIW, based on the recent blog post.
• did:plc and Dimiti's did:web 2.0 (next gen) proposals discussion.
  • https://github.com/decentralized-identity/identifiers-discovery/blob/main/agenda.md#meeting---25-sep-2023---1400-et

• Upcoming milestones
  • IIW Fall 2023
    • did:webs for Muggles session is planned with Markus Sabadello Drummond Reed Lance Byrd 
  • There are several potential opportunities, Daniel Hardman will report soon.
• DIF identifiers discovery "lifecycle of did:web identifiers"
  • Slides
  did:webplus meeting:
  • Alex Colgan, Lance Byrd, Ben Taylor, Victor Dobs, Alex Andrei, Dimitry Zagidulin, Stephen Curran, Benjamin Goering, Juan Caballero, Markus Sabadello, Michael Lodder
  • Signed did documents:
    • Private key control = modern equivalent of ftp
    • In did:webs, what is relevant is discovery. Control is bound to the AID.
      • With all three approaches, the domain name is still difficult
  • Scalability
    • Did documents fork and must be merged back, how do you reconcile these differences over 
      • Athlete working with multiple companies, and some created things overlap, images/likeness etc. and then occasionally merge back. The core data can be highly protected (athlete in their underwear)
      • Zero-knowledge proofs.
  • On a web server, paths are secured with signatures tied to the KEL
  • Whois folder about the subject, for discovery of more information.
  • Backwards hash links vs versionId
  • did:webplus considers duplicity detection as optional
  • The feeling is that KERI is more complex than necessary to be secure
    • building UX is very hard if you don't understand the technology
  • Adoption vector of did ecosystem to vLEI/KERI ecosystem is why we need to create this bridge
    • Expand to multiple implementations, multiple credential formats, etc
  • Can we compare and can we combine LedgerDomain/ToIP and possibly combine efforts for did:webplus and did:webs
    • Find the synergies
      • Compatible syntax, one domain name works for multiple methods

• https://github.com/dhh1128trustoverip/tswg-did-method-webs-specification/issues
• https://github.com/dhh1128trustoverip/tswg-did-method-webs-specification/pulls

None

•  Lance Byrd to create documentation for events needs to perform operations against DIDs