Meeting Date & Time
...
- NA/EU meeting: 08:00-09:00 PT / 16:00-17:00 UTC
- APAC meeting: 18:00-19:00 PT / 02:00-03:00 UTC
See the Calendar of ToIP Meetings for exact meeting dates, times and Zoom links.
Zoom Meeting
...
Recordings
- NA/EU Meeting: https://zoom.us/rec/j/91775722985?pwd=aVNVOUdlTXpQVnJJY1MzbmJsT0kxZz09share/1GEJYupqjookiY29nbXKV1kxDKV9GODe6Pd1eXCDJn3LRh0EClRylpdFVyXlHrub.jcFlHW0njlc9LbHK <== THIS IS THE LINK FOR SAM SMITH'S MAIN PROPOSAL PRESENTATION.
- APAC Meeting: https://zoom.us/rec/j/98535920136?pwd=NjFPcEdQc1VMTzJ6eDZJb3RNRzVtQT09
NOTE: These Zoom meeting links will be replaced by links to recordings of the meetings once they are available.
Attendees
- share/vilmV_6WtNZko3nmRnN4RU5OXvClRRC4rYioAPP6_m5iof_LXWaEKY31GiLJcEX5.MSGkOQhm1rsjuMnA. <== THE FINAL 30 MINS OF THIS RECORDING HAS ADDITIONAL SLIDES FOR SAM SMITH'S PROPOSAL PRESENTATION.
Attendees
NA/EU:
- Drummond Reed
- Daniel Hardman
- Wenjing Chu
- Sam Smith
- Darrell O'Donnell
- Judith Fleenor
- Oskar van Deventer
- Willem de Kok
- Neil Thomson
- Steve McCown
- Alex Andrei
- Christine Martin
- Keerthi Thomas
- Kyle Robinson
- Lance Byrd
- Mark Scott
- Philip Feairheller
- Sandy Aggarwal
- sankarshan
- Scott Whitmire
- Steven Milstein
- Torsten Lodderstedt
- Trinh Nguyen
- Leon Tian
- Antti Kettunen
- Judith Fleenor
APAC:
Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)
Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes | ||||
2 min |
| Leads |
| ||||
1 min | Review of previous action items | Leads |
| ||||
1 min | Leadership update | Leads | Sam Smith has volunteered to join Daniel Hardman, Wenjing Chu, and Drummond Reed as a co-lead of the TSPTF. You can read more about Sam here and more about KERI, CESR, and ACDC here. | ||||
40 mins | TSP Proposal #1: Sam Smith | Sam Smith | -Sam will present his proposal for design of the TSP designlayer. As a pre-read, please watch this 1-hour recording of Sam presenting the Hourglass Model to the TSWG APAC meeting last week.Notes about :
| 15 mins | Q&A on the above | All |
ACTION: All TSPTF members who missed the meeting: review Sam's slides, watch at least the NA/EU recording (and ideally the APAC recording as well), and if possible, read and contributed to the Github Discussion threads. |
1 min |
| Leads | Next week's meetings will be Proposal #2 from Daniel Hardman. |
Screenshots/Tables/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)
#1
Stage | Activity | Exit Criteria |
Initiation | Introduce members; agree on vision, mission, process, and tools | Consensus on vision, mission, process, tools |
Problem Definition | Stakeholders propose use cases to build a map of what problems they need to solve for whom | Consensus on the problem map |
Requirements | Extract and enumerate specific requirements from the problem map | Consensus on requirements |
Design Principles | Develop the principles that need to guide/govern design of the solution | Consensus on design principles |
Proposals | Members submit proposed solution designs | No further proposals |
Consolidation | Members identify common elements and seek to develop a consolidated proposal | Consensus on contents of first Working Draft |
Working Drafts † | A cycle of publishing Working Drafts, raising and resolving issues, and agreeing on revisions | Consensus on first Public Review Draft |
Public Review Drafts | Same as Working Draft stage except with public review | Consensus (or vote) on WG Approved Draft |
WG Approved Draft † | WG decision to submit for SC approval | Consensus (or vote) to submit for SC approval |
ToIP Approved Draft † | SC decision to approve as ToIP Deliverable | Consensus (or vote) to approve |
† Denotes the official name for a stage defined in the Linux Foundation Joint Development Foundation process document.
Decisions
- Sample Decision ItemNone
Action Items
- Sample Action ItemACTION: All TSPTF members who missed the meeting: review Sam's slides, watch at least the NA/EU recording (and ideally the APAC recording as well), and if possible, read and contributed to the Github Discussion threads.