...
Posted after the meeting:
Video Recording
Audio recording
Attendees
Future meeting Lance Byrd
Charles Lanahan
Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)
| Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes |
| 5 min | - Start recording
- Welcome & antitrust notice
- Introduction of new members
- Agenda review
| Chairs | |
| 5 mins | Review of action items from previous meeting | Chairs | - Lance Byrd will continue to pull informative info into implementors guide section PR
|
| 5 mins | Announcements | TF Leads | |
| 5 mins | Reports | Open | - Charles Lanahan is walking through the CESR spec and has been providing PRs/Issues for the spec as he implements a CESR parser.
- Upgraded the python reference impl to KERI 1.1.4
- Charles Lanahan pointed out the unit tests that failing. Also went through the GETTING_STARTED.
- Henk van Cann Setting diagrams directory on WebOfTrust
Diagram-list wrap up:
Decision after a round of initial listing: We have to invent a minimal effort version of the diagram - list Simple rules:
• Your repo is on trustoverip
• Your diagram is in /diagrams
• Decentralized approach referencing the diagrams
• Prevent copies
- Cole Davis Switchchord went live. Resulted in lots of activity across multiple industries.
- Many implications in the royalty business requiring strong identity related tech
- Big opportunity for growth
|
| 25 mins | Discussion | Open | Catchup on final changes status: - Implementors draft, to get multiple implementations to verify the steps
- Quality check on the spec
- Should be able to show interop between implementations
- This allows us to enter 'final' public review
- This should be socialized that more implementations are needed as a next step that we would like to help support
The "decentralized diagrams/images directory" and the totally automated approach of metadata gathering: - Input: We've defined a definition of a diagram: an image that resides on one of the weboftrust or trustoverip repos. We've defined a reference to a diagram: a URL to a source that resides on one of weboftrust or trustoverip user accounts. We reckoned that a diagram with a reference on the github page or elsewhere of its own repo is a strong commitment to its status (reputation of the diagram, if you will).We reckoned that a reference to diagram on any other github page of the group of repos that together form the "decentralized diagrams/images directory" is also a strong statement to its reputation. We grab the text around all references to a certain diagram to offer context about how it's used.
- Question to be discussed: are we going the right direction with 1:
- 1. ? Are there any other automatically derivable reputational scores?
- Request for input: what are the repos that belong to the group and could you point us (path!) to valuable image sources under each of these repos?
- The (intensity of the) orange columns ( row 1+2) of this prototype metadata of diagrams and images to be processed says how likely it'll be that we can automatically derive the data from the repos (example: column 'commit hash') versus the need to manually input afterwards (example: column 'level') (edited)
- Separating the admin control from did:web, to provide separate signing control is a big step.
- Wording this in a way that helps those outside our community to understand/appreciate that step is extremely valuable.
- What needs to be completed to enter the public review process?
|
| 5 mins | Any other business | Open | |
| 5 mins | - Review decisions/action items
- Planning for next meeting
| Chairs |
|
...