Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Meeting Link / Recording

Attendees

...

Philip Feairheller 

Lance Byrd 

John Jordan 

Sam Smith 

Sam Rookard 

Stephen Curran 

Markus Sabadello 

Alex Andrei 

Charles Lanahan 

Nuttawut Kongsuwan 

Hakan Yildiz 


Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
5 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
5 minsReview of action items from previous meetingChairs


Stephen Curran Philip Feairheller and Lance Byrd voted in as new chairs of this Task Force.

5 minsAnnouncementsTF Leads

News or events of interest to members:

  • ToIP has approved the Open Web Foundation (OWF) IPR license
    • We are 15 21 days into the 60 day period
  • This is an OFFICIAL TF as of Thursday night
    • From the TSWG:
      • ACTION: Drummond Reed to send an email to the TSWG mailing list notifying all TSWG members of a 7 day review period for the proposed DID WebS Method Task Force, followed by a 7-day email vote seeing if there are any objections.
      • ACTION: did:webs Task Force leads to contact Michelle Janata to add their Friday meeting onto ToIP calendar once the Task Force is officially approved
      • Chairs
        • Should be listed on the wiki page. 
      • Maintainers
        • Let Kevin know
    last Thursday night
  • IIW October 2023
    • We aim to be registered did method and have an implementation in the Universal resolver
    • Note: there will also be a TSP for Muggles session at IIW, based on the recent blog post.
  • did:plc and Dimiti's did:web 2.0 (next gen) proposals discussion.
5 mins

Reports

Open
  • Upcoming milestones
  • DIF identifiers discovery "lifecycle of did:web identifiers"did:webplus meeting:
    • Alex Colgan, Lance Byrd, Ben Taylor, Victor Dobs, Alex Andrei, Dimitry Zagidulin, Stephen Curran, Benjamin Goering, Juan Caballero, Markus Sabadello, Michael Lodder
    • Signed did documents:
      • Private key control = modern equivalent of ftp
      • In did:webs, what is relevant is discovery. Control is bound to the AID.
        • With all three approaches, the domain name is still difficult
    • Scalability
      • Did documents fork and must be merged back, how do you reconcile these differences over 
        • Athlete working with multiple companies, and some created things overlap, images/likeness etc. and then occasionally merge back. The core data can be highly protected (athlete in their underwear)
        • Zero-knowledge proofs.
    • On a web server, paths are secured with signatures tied to the KEL
    • Whois folder about the subject, for discovery of more information.
    • Backwards hash links vs versionId
    • did:webplus considers duplicity detection as optional
    • The feeling is that KERI is more complex than necessary to be secure
      • building UX is very hard if you don't understand the technology
    • Adoption vector of did ecosystem to vLEI/KERI ecosystem is why we need to create this bridge
      • Expand to multiple implementations, multiple credential formats,  etc
    • Can we compare and can we combine LedgerDomain/ToIP and possibly combine efforts for did:webplus and did:webs
      • Find the synergies
        • Compatible syntax, one domain name works for multiple methods
25 minsDiscussionOpen
5 minsAny other businessOpen

None

5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs
  •  Lance Byrd to create documentation for events needs to perform operations against DIDs