Vikas Malhotra IEEE CyberSecurity group (SSI/ToiP related) Link

Daniel Bachenheimer - will get an update on working groups for SSI Digital ID at ISO

Tim Bouma Digital Identity Lab of Canada update: Hyperledger URSA Code Review. In conversations with groups outside of ToIP, looking for a super simple ToIP (Architecture) four-layer (stack) model for external groups. Observation that : Layers 1 and 2 are primarily technical and Layers 3 and 4 are management. The document needs to provide an overview (and pointers to more detailed docs) as to how to achieve technical capability.  

EIC2022 - Feedback from Drummon Reid Drummond Reed, Judith Fleenor other attendees was that ToIP-related discussions were well recievedreceived. 

Review of diagrams, organization and content for the ToIP Tech Arch Spec - Working Draft, with a walk-through from Wenjing Chu 
Wenjing Chu The main update for today is sections 5.1 and 5.2 (plus embedding the diagrams from the IIW presentation). 
The introduction Tech Stack illustration needs to be simplified, which should be done once the spec core ideas have been resolved.

5.1 outlines the goals and design principles for the architecture. Each of the bullet points (and this is a general comment for all lists in the document) will need to be expanded both in this (top-level) spec and in more detailed documents. For example: what, precisely (in both human and technical terms), do Verifiability, Confidentiality and Privacy mean?

The focus of the ToIP stack are is layers 1, 2 & 3, which lay the foundation on which Layer 4 is built. Layer 4 will only be discussed in broad terms

Additional comments are in the Tech Spec itself

The discussion ended at the end of 5.2.2 (call end).

<To be continued in the afternoon session and following week>

As the Tech Arch Spec is getting filled out, it's quickly becoming clear that Google Docs and Google Docs comments need to (longer-term) move to a GitHub type solution, using issues vs comments (particularly detailed, verbose or visual/diagram comments).

Discussed today was which way to go - what the ACDC ToIP team is using, or GleifGLEIF, etc. and whether the doc format is pure MD or something that will eventually conform to the IETF publishing format. Judith Fleenor was on the call and needs to be part of selecting a solution.

ACTION: Wenjing Chu Will continue to fill in sections of the document in section order. The weekly schedule going forward will be reviewing both new work and comments as sections are completed.