Page Comparison

• Aim to bring together best practices in terms of interaction patterns, some people have come to provide views of current wallets and any feedback from users
• Focus of work so far on understanding IP's, didn't want to develop component library, or UI toolkit, wanted to look at underlying patterns, but there should be consistency of use but should be able to adapt to cultural context.  Opinionated principles & best practices around IP's so that businesses, designers could have a reference point for what has been developed and what is effective.
• Aligns with work in OWF where they are developing the technical components of the open source wallet, so this is the human side, so aim would be  to engage with OWF to offer complimentarity. 
• Have pulled out generic tasks / activities within wallets, have been trying to tease out the way of defining an IP, sits between behaviours and rituals and the UI / Interface / tech below.
• Needed more input from industry.  Need to understand existing challenges and where industry was seeing success with things rolled out to date.
• Consider Industry Engagement Survey for community 
  • Existing wallets, what works, any feedback from end-users
  • As consumers or as business professionals
  • Use to identify IP's to focus on initially
• Adam felt that industry survey very important, work of group is definitely needed.  Feedback from our customers - Solutions available very dev/tech focused.  Users want to do their stuff and do it easily and quickly. All they need to know is that the tech works as secure.  Currently working in NL on UNESCO project (NGDIL) - understand tech as a college, but they understand that for users (students, tutors) needs to be a simple easy-to-use app.
• EG no-code experiences - also true for Issuer

Andrew Slack commented that the balance between making it easy to use, and the burden of fidelity of control that the tech allows.  

Adam - Education needs to come alongside the development of the UX, also need to know what they are doing and implications of what they are doing.  EG over verification challenge, needs to be at the forefront of issuer education when issuing credentials. 

Andrew Slack Efficiency vs convenience and implications are key in this balance

Judith Fleenor Yesterday went to Chase bank online account - 'we have updated our T's & C's - please accept to continue' - first document was 125 pages, second was 10 pages - just wanted to do an account check, 

At any time that we want to, we can eliminate paper statements and go 100% digital - one of several terms that she was obliged to sign up to - just to continue using the service. 

Judith spoke to the bank and was very angry - lack of intro - simple explanation - reasons, warning, no right to refuse.  Could have given time to read 125pgs.  As Judith only was checking something, but had she needed to transfer funds then would have had to accept before being able to use the service she pays for.

Drummond Reed That’s a “contract of adhesion”

Adam commented that X (formerly Twitter) use of biometrics has similar lack of consent-basis for verified users on their platform.  Worldcoin is another example of this type of company that is collecting biometric data.

Nicky Hickman draft survey questions doc in G-Drive

Erika to share Mitre consumer survey for alignment

Adam to explore sharing styling data model - should also look at OCA (Human Colossus Foundation)