...
Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes |
3 min |
| Chairs |
|
20 min | Review of previous action items | Chairs |
- Standardised pointer structure: As we go through the exercise of putting the initial MVP identifiers together, it will hopefully expose an underlying pattern of structure which we can then use to build out a model that we can share with other ecosystems - Proposed idea, start with a “Minimum viable” set of identifiers - DIDs, X.509 and DNS which then we can iterate out from afterwards |
10 mins | Open discussion points from previous NA/EU meeting | All | How should we structure the spec and break up the work? How long should we give ourselves (realistically) to have a full Working Draft? We talked about the essence of what the spec needs to cover. Several options were discussed:
Markus brought up the option of treating each method of producing a cryptographic synonym proof as a DID method. Then a DID resolver, given two DIDs, could do the work of resolving them, obtaining the cryptographic synonym proofs, verifying them, and finally comparing them to prove that they are synonyms (or not).
|
15 mins | Assignment of work items for spec first draft | All |
|
10 mins | Other topics |
|
|
5 mins |
| Chairs |
|
...