Page Comparison

...

Time	Agenda Item	Lead	Notes
5 min	Start recording Welcome & antitrust notice Introduction of new members Agenda review	Chairs	Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role. New Members:
5 min	Review of previous action items	Chairs	The action items from the 2022-12-23 meeting all appeared to be agenda items for this meeting.
5 min	Heads up on W3C Credentials Community Group work item	Chairs	As an FYI, the W3C Credentials Community Group (CCG) has adopted a work item on "Verifiable Issuers and Verifiers" based on this 2022 Rebooting the Web of Trust paper: https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot11-the-hague/blob/master/final-documents/verifiable-issuers-and-verifiers.pdf Drummond Reed : Are revocation registries part of the TR family? Work item bought from CCG is linked to : https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot11-the-hague/blob/master/final-documents/verifiable-issuers-and-verifiers.pdf Should pay attention to European identity requirements to inform the Trust Registry spec. Savita Farooqui : TRAIN (using DNS-based trust) is another input mathieu : Projects referenced in the paper that I’m assuming all need good understanding/alignment: EBSI Trusted Issuer Registry, ETSI TS 119 612, eSSIF-Lab TRAIN, the Trust over IP Foundation Trust Registry Protocol DNS being brought up frequently. Neil Thomson : Projects referenced in the paper that I’m assuming all need good understanding/alignment: EBSI Trusted Issuer Registry, ETSI TS 119 612, eSSIF-Lab TRAIN, the Trust over IP Foundation Trust Registry Protocol Drummond Reed interesting to consider how DNS will inform TR work. Savita Farooqui : All registries and the overlap with TR are to consider. Drummond Reed : AIDs (Autonomous Identifiers ): You can discover an AID anywhere and independently verify it. Savita Farooqui : What provides trust. Tim Bouma : Experimenting with blind signatures. Trust is context.
20 mins	Alignment on a way forward	Chairs	Proposal of a way forward that people can align on.
15 mins	Primary models	Andor	Primary models and basic evolution approach for future versions Tim Bouma :Transfer function: Time and utility preference. Drummond Reed v1 spec: * Verifiable issuers vs. Verifiable verifiers. * @Darrell: Context was required to authorize issuers vs. verifiers. RWOT: naive. Assurance framework not the whole picture. Tim Bouma : risk transfer vs. accountability transfer. Risk management function. * Trust Action Model: $h(g(f(C, x)))$ * where: * $f(C, x)$ is a trust embedding * $g(f(C, x))$ is a trust decision * $h(g(f(C, x))) = z$ represents an action (or effect) based upon a trust decision. It chooses $z_i \in \mathbb{Z}$ where $\mathbb{Z}$ represents a set of possible effects from a trust decision. * $C$ is the decision context * $x$ is the set of claims * Scope: This task force is focused on supporting system around $c_{\text{trust services}}$ and the data models in $x$, which represent claims. While recommendations may be provided on the other functions, anything outside of $c_{\text{trust services}}$ and $x$ is considered non-normative and out of scope. Some ways this translates within the deliverable: * Specification Deliverable * Service Discovery * Containers * Data Models * APIs * Companion Guide: * Recommendations and best practices * $\{c_i, c_j\} \in C$ where C is the decision context and $c_i, c_j$, are different data contexts. * $x$ represents claim data rendered here: https://hackmd.io/7FGDfgIfTBWrd1wQ7RngSQ
5 mins	Collaboration tools	All	Agreement about how to move forward on collaboration. Google docs or Github
5 mins	Review decisions/action items Planning for next meeting	Chairs

...

Versions Compared

Old Version 3

New Version 4

Key