Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Meeting Date

  •  

Attendees

Main Goal of this Meeting:

...

TimeItemLeadNotes
1 minWelcome & Antitrust Policy NoticeChairs
2 minsIntroduction of new membersChairs
1 minAgenda reviewChairs
30 5 mins

Update on the offline meeting on CTWG workflow


10 30 minsWalk-through of one term through the entire CTWG workflowDaniel Hardman
2 minsReview of Decisions and Action Items Chairs
1 minNext meetingChairs

...

  1. New members
  2. Update on the offline meeting on CTWG workflow
  3. Walk-through of one term through the entire CTWG workflow w/ Daniel Hardman
    1. Rieks Joostensummarized what he and Daniel Hardmandiscussed in their offline meeting
    2. This is documented in an update to the Specification for Creating and Using Terms
    3. The Ingest phase is as simple and broad as possible.
    4. The Curate phase is where the CTWG adds value.
    5. The Produce stage is where the outputs re formed prior to processing.
    6. Rieks and Daniel also talked about versioning.
      1. GitHub has robust tools for versioning.
      2. However it could be too difficult for authors to use GitHub values. Rieks favored using human-readable version numbers.
      3. The decision was to face the problems as they would arise, because versioning may not be needed at the start.
      4. As we go forward, we could learn what's needed.
    7. Dan Gisolfi asked about next steps, e.g., APIs for getting terms from the corpus?
      1. Rieks said that Daniel Hardman was going to do a walk-through of the complete workflow in order to determine what those APIs would be.
  4. Foteinos then showed what has been developed for terminology management at GR Net.
  5. Review of Decisions and Action Items
  6. Next meeting

Slides

Image Added

Decisions

  •  Sample Decision Item

...