Meeting Date
Attendees
- Drummond Reed
- Rieks Joosten
- Daniel Hardman <== can't attend today
- Dan Gisolfi
- Scott Perry
- Steven MilsteinJim StClair
- Foteinos Mergoupis-Anagnou (from GRNET)
Main Goal of this Meeting:
...
Time | Item | Lead | Notes |
1 min | Welcome & Antitrust Policy Notice | Chairs | |
2 mins | Introduction of new members | Chairs | |
1 min | Agenda review | Chairs | |
30 5 mins | Update on the offline meeting on CTWG workflow | ||
10 30 mins | Walk-through of one term through the entire CTWG workflow | Daniel Hardman | |
2 mins | Review of Decisions and Action Items | Chairs | |
1 min | Next meeting | Chairs |
...
- New members
- Update on the offline meeting on CTWG workflow
- Walk-through of one term through the entire CTWG workflow w/ Daniel Hardman
- Rieks Joostensummarized what he and Daniel Hardmandiscussed in their offline meeting
- This is documented in an update to the Specification for Creating and Using Terms
- The Ingest phase is as simple and broad as possible.
- The Curate phase is where the CTWG adds value.
- The Produce stage is where the outputs re formed prior to processing.
- Rieks and Daniel also talked about versioning.
- GitHub has robust tools for versioning.
- However it could be too difficult for authors to use GitHub values. Rieks favored using human-readable version numbers.
- The decision was to face the problems as they would arise, because versioning may not be needed at the start.
- As we go forward, we could learn what's needed.
- Dan Gisolfi asked about next steps, e.g., APIs for getting terms from the corpus?
- Rieks said that Daniel Hardman was going to do a walk-through of the complete workflow in order to determine what those APIs would be.
- Foteinos then showed what has been developed for terminology management at GR Net.
- Review of Decisions and Action Items
- Next meeting
Slides
Decisions
- Sample Decision Item
...